Oh? Who else would it be? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Nov 17, 2014 9:47 PM, "Mike Hammett via Af" <[email protected]> wrote:
> They are. I believe RF Elements is the OEM for a few other things across > the industry as well. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Ken Hohhof via Af" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Monday, November 17, 2014 7:02:54 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ePMP power limits > > Oh, wait, you’re talking about ePMP sectors? Are those Laird? I > thought they were made by RF Elements. > > *From:* Ken Hohhof via Af <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Monday, November 17, 2014 7:01 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP power limits > > I think you’re being unfair to the Laird sourced Cambium sectors. As > long as you choose the “Gen II” or “Gen III” KP sectors, those should be > good choices as well, and maybe a little better price. Main differences I > think would be: > > KP specifies beamwidth at 3 dB points > KP has built in downtilt > > Cambium has bracket to hold a 450 AP papoose style > Cambium has null fill > Cambium brackets are hot dip galvanized with stainless steel hardware > > The mechanical design and connector placement are different, you may > prefer one or the other. Some people have complained about the stainless > steel hardware, but they are standard bolts and nuts so you could replace > them or substitute silicon bronze nuts or use antiseize. Or buy the KP > antennas. > > Laird makes many products and has acquired many companies, I don’t think > you can paint all their products with one brush. And as an example, some > people have cast aspersions (asparagus if you’re Louie Gohmert) on the > Cushcraft 15 dBi yagi, actually I’ve found it performs very well. The Pac > Wireless wire grids however are junk, they turn to rust in about 5 years. > > > *From:* Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Monday, November 17, 2014 6:44 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP power limits > > > Uhm I'd recommend beer cans over Laird sectors. KP is an excellent choice. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Nov 17, 2014 7:39 PM, "Keith Fletcher via Af" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> You recommend KP sectors over Cambium sectors? >> >> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Yes, sorry >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:34 PM, TJ Trout via Af <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> 20mhz? >>>> On Nov 14, 2014 8:12 AM, "Josh Luthman via Af" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Note these 20 second tests were done on an internally timed AP on a >>>>> KP sector with a downlink of -40 and uplink -60 (yay ATP) >>>>> >>>>> 2.3 release >>>>> Downlink 85.228 Mbps >>>>> Uplink 21.986 Mbps >>>>> Aggregate 107.214 Mbps >>>>> >>>>> ^ This never deviated more than 1 Mbps (less than 1%!) >>>>> >>>>> 2.3.1rc3 >>>>> Downlink >>>>> 81.259 Mbps >>>>> Uplink >>>>> 19.326 Mbps >>>>> Aggregate >>>>> 100.585 Mbps >>>>> >>>>> Downlink >>>>> 83.977 Mbps >>>>> Uplink >>>>> 19.22 Mbps >>>>> Aggregate >>>>> 103.197 Mbps >>>>> >>>>> Downlink >>>>> 83.161 Mbps >>>>> Uplink >>>>> 19.34 Mbps >>>>> Aggregate >>>>> 102.501 Mbps >>>>> >>>>> Definitely deploying 2.3 both due to more/stable bandwidth and the >>>>> fact it is a release =) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Latest release* 2.3 >>>>>> >>>>>> I'll slap on 2.3.1 when I get some downtime at the office tomorrow. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Mike Hammett via Af <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> All the way to 2.3.1? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>> *From: *"Josh Luthman via Af" <[email protected]> >>>>>>> *To: *[email protected] >>>>>>> *Sent: *Thursday, November 13, 2014 8:11:57 PM >>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ePMP power limits >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Latest firmware just got me 110 megs aggregate on a wireless test. >>>>>>> That's not bad in 20 MHz MIMO especially when it has fixed scheduling. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>> On Nov 13, 2014 8:37 PM, "Mike Hammett via Af" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I prefer ePMP over 450 as I can afford to buy multiple of them >>>>>>>> and use sectors instead of omnis. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>> *From: *"Kurt Fankhauser via Af" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> *To: *[email protected] >>>>>>>> *Sent: *Thursday, November 13, 2014 7:04:47 PM >>>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ePMP power limits >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> this is why i prefer 450 over epmp on omnis, cant hit legal eirp >>>>>>>> with the omni >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Kurt Fankhauser >>>>>>>> Wavelinc Communications >>>>>>>> P.O. Box 126 >>>>>>>> Bucyrus, OH 44820 >>>>>>>> http://www.wavelinc.com >>>>>>>> tel. 419-562-6405 >>>>>>>> fax. 419-617-0110 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > On Nov 13, 2014, at 7:21 PM, Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > Neat pop up!!! This is a nonsync integrated unit. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > 19:00:28 The Transmitter Output Power limitations 5.x GHz bands >>>>>>>> are: >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > For ETSI and FCC regions: >>>>>>>> > 5.1-5.2 GHz: 18 dBm >>>>>>>> > 5.47-5.725 GHz: 13-16 dBm >>>>>>>> > 5.725-5.88 GHz: 23 dBm >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > For other regions: >>>>>>>> > 5.1-5.47 GHz: 27 dBm >>>>>>>> > 5.47-5.88 GHz: 30 dBm >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > Josh Luthman >>>>>>>> > Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>> > Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>> > 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>> > Suite 1337 >>>>>>>> > Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > >
