uh Zoidberg that is... On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Chuck Macenski via Af <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why not Zoidburg (airFiber)? > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Sean Heskett via Af <[email protected]> wrote: > >> i would go licensed gear from SAF (or your favorite licensed PTP vendor). >> >> we keep all the unlicensed bands available for PMP...we use licensed for >> PTP. >> >> the difference between a wifi backhaul and a licensed backhaul is like >> the difference between a Ford Focus and a Ferrari F12berlinetta. they are >> both cars that drive on roads but that's about where the similarities end. >> same thing with backhauls. >> >> 2 cents >> >> -sean >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Paul McCall via Af <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Cambium, >> > >> > Can you please make a suggestion as to what equipment that you >> recommend to us for this type of problem/solution? >> > >> > Paul >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul McCall via Af >> > Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 12:32 PM >> > To: [email protected] >> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force >> > >> > For Cambium.... we have a very remote tower that feeds several other >> towers. Everything is OSPF but logically... >> > >> > Tower R (the main remote tower - a 190 ft. Rohn 25G with several >> anti-twist devices) is "fed" by... >> > Tower A - 26 miles away - UBNT 3.65ghz Rocket M5 AND a Mikrotik >> RB912 5 Ghz >> > This commercial tower (Tower A) has over 300Mbit of >> usable bandwidth and feeds about 75 to 85 Mbit to Tower A >> > Tower B - 9 miles away - UBNT 5ghz Rocket M5 >> > This tower (Tower B) is a 90 ft. Rohn 25G >> > >> > Tower R then feeds... >> > Tower C - 12 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 50 Mbit of >> usable bandwidth. (Rohn 25G 120 ft.) >> > Tower D - 15 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 40 Mbit of >> usable bandwidth. (Rohn 25G 120 ft.) >> > Tower E - 17 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 40 Mbit of >> usable bandwidth. (Rohn 25G 120 ft.) >> > Tower F - 14 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 40 Mbit of >> usable bandwidth. (Rohn 25G 120 ft.) >> > >> > To get all this to work without Sync was quite a frequency juggling >> act. There are other towers in the area and towers C, D, E, F connect >> (chain) to each other on the "back side" and we use a couple 3.65Ghz UBNT >> radios on the backside links. >> > >> > The challenge... >> > >> > First of all, I need more BW to each tower, but mostly Tower C. And, I >> need better consistency... at times the links do not perform as I expect >> and then I get customer complaints etc. I hate that. >> > >> > So, what would be the best solution that Cambium can recommend other >> than a ton of licensed links? Obviously, the gear I am using now is >> inexpensive. >> > >> > The PTP110 solution ... 2ms unsynced.... can it sync, now or >> tomorrow? Latency with sync? >> > >> > Paul >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matt via Af >> > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 11:47 AM >> > To: [email protected] >> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force >> > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > Please allow me to clarify. >> > > >> > > The Force 110 uses the Connectorized UnSync'd unit with the two >> 10/100 FE ports. >> > > >> > > The Force 110 PTP uses the Connectorized GPS Sync'd unit with the >> > > single GigE port that supports 802.3af PoE in addition to proprietary >> PoE. GPS capabilities will be disabled (but the radio can still use the on >> board GPS chip to track satellites and provide coordinates). >> > > >> > > The 2ms latency is achieved purely through software changes in >> Release 2.4 and will apply to both products. >> > >> > Reading this spec sheet. >> > >> > >> http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/files/PRODUCTS/ePMP/FORCE/Force%20110%20PTP_Oct2014.pdf >> > >> > >>>LATENCY (nominal, one way) < 2 ms (PTP Mode), 6 ms (Flexible Frame >> > >>>Mode) , 17 ms (GPS Sync Mode) >> > >
