Earlier I posted that I was having some through put issues. I have a 2.4 AP
with 40 subs. I started having issues where customers were having horrific
ping times on the AP, the majority anyways. I would still have customers
that were stellar most of the time. Firmwares were all over the place, all
on the same level as well as AP with the same issue. I had segregated the
subs to multiple Color Codes, as times I had as few as 1 to 4 subs
registered at a time. If I swapped color codes to a different code and
allowed 4 different users on, at times the issue would follow them as well.

 

I had a tech swap out the AP 2 evenings ago, and to my dismay I noticed the
issue right away. Today I re-routed a back up back haul to that site and the
AP is the only device pulling service from that BH. I have 2 more sites that
feed off of this tower and they are not experiencing the issue. This issue
crept up on us last Friday night. I have only heard from a handful of users
so I don't know if everyone is experiencing the issue, or at least noticed.
For the most part its really bad at time during prime time, however today
and during the day Monday it was real noticeable. From what I can tell on my
MikroTik is that its really only handing out about 3 meg right now. This
network is bridged, I have some Tiks in place to start routing and also for
management purposes. I had the same results from just using a standard
switch. I am not experiencing any other issues on that network. All radios,
except for 4, are NAT enabled. The other 4 at times I would have totally
disabled or not associated with the same results

 

We were suspecting a bad Canopy radio mucking up the AP, which we have seen
but its rare. But like I said we have seen it with only a few users
associated. I cant imagine that I had several bad radios at once. The AP is
swapped out. Could it be a network issue? In all my years of using Canopy I
have never seen this issue. I fear that my BS skills may be wearing thin on
my customers, but I am unsure of where to look

 

Thanks

Heith

 

Reply via email to