If you'd put on your loin cloth, maybe it wouldn't be so shy.
--
bp
<part {dash} 15 {at} SkylineBroadbandService {dot} com>
On 12/8/2014 2:23 PM, Chuck McCown via Af wrote:
It won’t send me my password...
*From:* Sean Heskett via Af <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Monday, December 08, 2014 3:22 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Animal Farm List weirdness/requests
aaahhhhh THANK YOU JOSH!!!!! i owe you a beer at AF ;-)
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
In regards to 1 go here and disable sending yourself your own
messages
http://afmug.com/mailman/options/af
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Mike Hammett via Af <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I haven't noticed #1.
PDMNet was going to fix #2 back in September, but things came up.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Sean Heskett via Af" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
*To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent: *Monday, December 8, 2014 4:12:18 PM
*Subject: *[AFMUG] Animal Farm List weirdness/requests
Hello,
Whomever is now the list manager I have two requests (gripes)
1. for some reason when i send a message it shows up in the
conversation thread twice (i'm using Gmail) I'm not sure if
everyone else sees it twice or just me. i only get one
message from other users (which is the expected behavior).
2. It only shows the name of the person who sent the message
and strips out their email. Is there any way we can add this
back in. It's really frustrating when a cambium or UBNT
employee will post a reply and i don't immediately recognize
that this is a response from the manufacturer. even if it
stripped the email but put back in "user at domain dot com"
instead of "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" if the
reason from it's removal was to prevent spam etc.
2a. For the manufacturers, would y'all mind adding a signature
file until this is fixed so we know it's an "official" response???
thanks for listening,
Sean