I believe we established the 450 antennas are made by Laird. Not a big fan of their antennas myself.
I've been very happy with KP antennas for some time. What differences are you looking for, Kade? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Kade Sullivan via Af <[email protected]> wrote: > I asked KP for an explanation of the differences between them a few months > ago. He said he'd contact his engineer but I never heard back. When you > look at the antenna profile, at first glance it looks like the KP antenna > is better. But once you look closer, it looks like each polarity is just > more offset from the other compared to the cambium, which makes the > overlapped profile look better. It doesnt look any better to me on paper > after closer examination, even though supposedly it's rated better. > > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I expect it's like Mike Tyson vs an infant. >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> On Dec 12, 2014 4:04 PM, "Matt via Af" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Has anyone compared the KP 90 degree 3.6GHZ sector with the Cambium >>> for use with 450? >>> >>
