I would see if you can find any use NETEQ's — Sent from Mailbox
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 2:26 PM, That One Guy via Af <[email protected]> wrote: > This is a sample base report from the one at my house, I dont have a > maintenance contract and its old hardware and locked in old firmware so > little of it works for the reporting. but this is the default cloud report. > Our contract customers who choose to maintain their maintenance agreements > can do alot more, like AD integration, all that good stuff. > We have done managed office firewalls with these, but normally we just try > to get the customer under a managed services contract. > We have dropped them in on a couple residential customers networks long > enough to pull reports, but its a risk to have money at a residence that is > already abusing the system > On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 1:17 PM, That One Guy <[email protected]> > wrote: >> yes, with the maintenance contract you can get as detailed as you want >> without you can only do the source/dest IP/port but not identification of >> the traffic type >> If you have it at a POP just create a policy (in and out) specific to the >> monitored customer and make sure those policies are logging all traffic. >> I believe the 60 series does not have internal storage, the higher series >> do. but you can send to syslog and one of the open source ones, i dont >> recall which, has fortigate specific reporting >> >> Its pretty slick, especially for office environments, the generic cloud >> reporting keeps customers happy >> >> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Wireless Admin via Af <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Does FortiOS provide detailed report on Internet usage? Sorry >>> for the question but I don’t have any experience with this system. >>> >>> >>> >>> Steve B. >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy via >>> Af >>> *Sent:* Friday, December 26, 2014 2:04 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Customer - Detailed Usage Report >>> >>> >>> >>> we are looking at putting 60d and 90d in as our site/POP routers. It will >>> give us more visibility on the network. It does require a service contract >>> for advanced features and reporting. There are a couple syslog servers I >>> guess that can format the reports on these >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 1:00 PM, That One Guy <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> http://www.avfirewalls.com/?gclid=Cj0KEQiAq_SkBRC3jLvJ1IPt2eIBEiQASUZy1z9JetUR94rPQ3lbbwki727bo9hzSXDX33upLwc2LkEaAiBm8P8HAQ >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Wireless Admin via Af <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Is there a low end unit that can do this? Any Idea what price range? >>> >>> >>> >>> Steve B >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy via >>> Af >>> *Sent:* Friday, December 26, 2014 12:37 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Customer - Detailed Usage Report >>> >>> >>> >>> A Fortigate will do that. you can even cobble it down to showing what >>> user is logged in and what theyre doing >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Ken Hohhof via Af <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> You could put in one of the Mikrotik routers that have the LCD and lock >>> it to displaying the WAN side bandwidth graph. It won’t tell them what is >>> using all the bandwidth, but they can certainly go around shutting stuff >>> off to see what is causing the usage. Like oh, it went down when I shut >>> off the satellite TV receiver, I didn’t know that used the Internet. Or >>> look, it goes up whenever my daughter uses Facetime, that uses the >>> Internet? Or we all clicked to upgrade our iOS versions and the graph has >>> been pegged for the last day, meanwhile my Xbox games are lagging. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]> >>> >>> *Sent:* Friday, December 26, 2014 11:29 AM >>> >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Customer - Detailed Usage Report >>> >>> >>> >>> Powercode does bits down to the minute. >>> >>> If you want more detailed you'll probably need ntop or Procera. >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Dec 26, 2014 12:01 PM, "Wireless Admin via Af" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Can anyone suggest a system that would allow an ISP to provide a customer >>> a detailed report on Internet usage. I’m talking about the ability to show >>> a customer, on usage based billing, what caused the consumption. My >>> thought would be to route the customers IP through a specialized process >>> for a limited period of time so details could be collected. A sort of >>> debug mode. >>> >>> >>> >>> Steve B >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the >>> parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you >>> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not >>> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the >>> parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you >>> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not >>> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the >>> parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you >>> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not >>> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the >> parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you >> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not >> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >> > -- > All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the > parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you > can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not > use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
