Dropping all their traffic sounds like a more fun solution.
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]> wrote: > > Waste of your time IMO. Not very fun. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Nate Burke via Af <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I guess what I should do is set them up so that their IP Address is >> queued to a random speed each time they pull the files. Or would that be >> rude? >> >> >> On 12/26/2014 4:28 PM, Josh Luthman via Af wrote: >> >> It's good to know there are still rude people out there. I was beginning >> to worry. >> >> Thanks for the heads up! >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Nate Burke via Af <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Been trying to track down a 20 second 400mb spike in outbound traffic >>> that has been happening every 10 minutes all day. Finally tracked it down >>> to my Speedtest.net server. Someone automated pulling the test files via >>> HTTP. It shows up in my server logs, but not in the speedtest.net >>> reports. >>> >>> They simultaneously pull 8 copies of all 10 test .jpg files. >>> >>> I've blocked their IP Address, automating it like that just seems a >>> little rude. >>> >>> Just wanted to give anyone else running a speedtest.net server a heads >>> up. >>> >>> Nate >>> >> >> >
