Who needs it...
Just proliferate the air with great wifi data streams where spectrum is
abundant as water.
On 12/23/2014 7:30 PM, Josh Luthman via Af wrote:
Ubnt flat out doesn't have GPS.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Dec 23, 2014 8:26 PM, "Josh Reynolds via Af" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I don't know anyone using GPS on ubnt
On December 23, 2014 4:23:20 PM AKST, "Jerry Richardson (airCloud)
via Af" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Our region is pretty noisy and getting noisier. Currently we
are using Ubnt Rocket 90deg sectors although I have considered
these to really be more like 75 degrees due UBNT using -6dB as
the rolloff point.
We have seen a dramatic improvement with a Titanium sector and
plan on replacing the other rockets with Titaniums and
considering going to 60deg or maybe even 45 degree and using
GPS sync to reuse channels.
What if any have been your experiences with going to narrower
sectors for a given area? I would expect to see ~3dB
improvement in links just by reducing the antenna pattern, and
~3dB due to power density. Additional gains might be made from
improved F/B rejection and improved shielding, possibly
another ~3dB? This could mean anywhere from 6-9dB improveme nt
on every link.
What are your experiences with UBNT GPS? We would not use
dynamic, but rather fixed downlink %. I know we will give up
some B/W but better spectrum management might be worth the
trade. The link improvements should push the radios into
higher modulation further mitigating the loss by using GPS
Thoughts?
Comments?
Jerry
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
