a clear answer from "the man" never hurts, but cambium is motorola, neither of which are known for their forthrightness.... look at the 320 lie their salesmen pushed right up til the dying breath. we are big boys round here, we can handle the truth, no matter what you think colonial nathan R jessup suggests https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMqDXxkGNKg
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 8:53 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af < [email protected]> wrote: > I don't think we'll see anything new for FSK for a while. Hopefully that > changes. But I keep bugging them about that whole "no radio left behind" > thing. Or in this case, no platform left behind. FSK won't die. > > On 12/29/2014 5:38 PM, Bill Prince via Af wrote: > > so far no > > :-( > > -- > bp > <part {dash} 15 {at} SkylineBroadbandService {dot} com> > > > On 12/29/2014 2:20 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote: > > :-( but no fsk? > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Bill Prince via Af <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 13.2.1 on PMP450/430. >> >> -- >> bp >> <part {dash} 15 {at} SkylineBroadbandService {dot} com> >> >> >> On 12/29/2014 2:09 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote: >> >> they have a downloadable config file? >> >> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Kade Sullivan via Af <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> It took 10+ years to get downloadable configuration file. Everything >>> they do (or dont do) is believable to me at this point. >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Eric Kuhnke via Af <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I really want to know how you can possibly screw up the http/https >>>> interface on a radio, to set basic parameters, in such a way that it >>>> consumes massive amounts of CPU on the client-side browser and only works >>>> with one browser... >>>> >>>> If even a super low budget company like TP-Link can make $22 802.11n >>>> SOHO routers that have acceptably usable http GUIs, why not Cambium? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Jay Weekley via Af <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I thought I was the only one. My field unit is old but I would assume >>>>> it would work with an updated browser since every other radio does but >>>>> ePMP >>>>> was pretty much unusable. I finally reloaded my laptops OS and updates. >>>>> Only Chrome will work with the ePMP interface. IE won't work at all and >>>>> Mozilla give constant script errors. We have another tech that has the >>>>> same >>>>> issue with a newer laptop. >>>>> >>>>> Kurt Fankhauser via Af wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I can't take it anymore, I'm going back to UBNT for non-FSK/450 >>>>>> stuff. I can no longer deal with the slow and horrible EPMP interface. I >>>>>> thought it would get better as the firmware matured but its not getting >>>>>> any >>>>>> better, Just loaded the latest firmware 2.3.3 and its still slower than a >>>>>> turtle going in the wrong direction. For crying out loud the old Tranzeo >>>>>> interface is faster than this! Chrome, and IE 11 it doesn't matter it >>>>>> literally takes me 30 minutes to config one of these radios. By the time >>>>>> you upgrade the firmware and "try" to upload a template to one. (never >>>>>> does >>>>>> want to take a backup config is always erroring out) I can't afford to be >>>>>> sitting at the bench all day fiddling with these radios. You can't even >>>>>> type text in the fields that already have characters in them without >>>>>> getting some weird outcome. Everytime i go to deal with one of these >>>>>> radios >>>>>> i always end up with obscenities coming out of my mouth and I even have a >>>>>> hole punched in a wall in the shop cause i got so frustrated with one a >>>>>> few >>>>>> weeks back. >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe Bitlomat will come out with third party firmware for these and >>>>>> save us all.... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Kurt Fankhauser >>>>>> >>>>>> Wavelinc Communications >>>>>> >>>>>> P.O. Box 126 >>>>>> >>>>>> Bucyrus, OH 44820 >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.wavelinc.com <http://www.wavelinc.com/> >>>>>> >>>>>> tel. 419-562-6405 >>>>>> >>>>>> fax. 419-617-0110 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that >> the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you >> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not >> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >> >> >> > > > -- > All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the > parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you > can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not > use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 > > > > -- All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
