More than 255 addresses on ONE interface?
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:59 PM, That One Guy <[email protected]> wrote: > This is a transition on this particular project, moving all the IPs from a > powercode BMU to an intermediary router, but some of our sites could easily > exceed this number. > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> 255 until 2.2 kernel which is like a bazillion. I'm sure MT is using a >> later version of the kernel. >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I've never done 20, but I also don't know what it would be. Usually >>> when we are doing more than a couple, it is a transition kind of thing >>> while we are preparing a new link or something. >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:23 AM, That One Guy <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> We recently found that our Fortigates have a limit to the number of IPs >>>> you can assign to a single interface, pretty low at 20 something. We havent >>>> found a limit in the Imagestreams. >>>> >>>> Is there a limit on Mikrotik? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that >>>> the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you >>>> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not >>>> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> -- >>> bp >>> part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com >>> >> >> > > > -- > All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the > parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you > can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not > use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >
