I don't really see a lot of point in going with 3.65 there... if you're going with ubnt, 5ghz is cheaper and better, go with 5.1 and you'll most likely stay out of the way of any routers.
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:03 AM, That One Guy <[email protected]> wrote: > I hate our ubnt 365, it was cheap and handy, but is now a big problem to > forklift it out of the way. If youre down in trees and wont impact any > other sites you could get away with it, but like Josh said, 5.1 is the way > to go, 3ghz wont really propagate any better > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Because if you install a second POP with 3.65, you will want to sync them >> to reduce the noise floor. Noise floor is an under-appreciated resource. >> >> bp >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >> >> >> On 1/6/2015 6:15 PM, Mark - Myakka Technologies wrote: >> >>> Setting up an area that we are going to feed 3-6 people from AP. Was >>> thinking ePMP or UBNT. Giving serious thought to UBNT 3.65 just to >>> stay out of users routers way. >>> >>> We are only going to be shooting about 1000' or so. Maybe some trees, >>> but going to try to stay under canopy. I really think anything will >>> work here. Even 5ghz should work with the trees at these distances. >>> >>> Any reason I shouldn't go with UBNT 3.65? >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- > All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the > parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you > can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not > use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >
