Got 4 pairs of 450's in the air with no problems. The only real issue I had getting them to work was when we put the first pair up, I had to disable the 5.4 scan channels on the slave before it would register on the 5.8 channel it was set to. It would see the BHM at --55 but never connect though it tried 50+ times before we figured out what took care of it. No problem with the other 3 doing that though. Been very happy with them and getting ready to deploy at least 6 more pair in the near future.
Craig ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve D" <[email protected]> To: "af" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2015 8:40:16 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTP230 talk to a PTP450? My 230's are running the firmware they were born with 10.3.something IIRC. Had issues with a bench test on one of the newer builds, decided the field units were working good enough and walked away. I guess on that note, this is a good time as any to ask how people are finding the ptp450's to run? On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Matt < [email protected] > wrote: >> Any chance of that? I know it sounds silly but would make alignment real >> easy since we'd be converting to connectorized antenna's at the same time. >> >> I suspect the answer to be "no" but figured worth an ask... Sure would be nice if the problems with the PTP230 would be fixed. Seems like all our links that run in 3X mode drop in and out with short session uptimes. Lock them at lower bandwidth of 2X and there solid even though link tests are always 99+ percent at 3X. Seems to be an issue with changing modulation rates. Rather then just change from 3X to 2X it drops the connection I am guessing. Hopefully the PTP450 does not have same issue?
