Illinois just authorized a state OSHA in one of the new laws, I see brides required, er um, I mean compliance fees and inspection taffifs
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: > Comtrain is not a governing body. > > OSHA / NATE certification meets the bill. > > josh reynolds :: chief information officer > spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com > > On 01/09/2015 04:49 PM, Paul McCall wrote: > > Everyone is Comtrained. All equipment is inspected regularly. Competency > is at a high level. > > Regular safety procedures, coupled with safety meeting discussions is more > what I am looking to improve on. > > Example… > > All the SITE inspection checks that would need to be done before someone > steps on the tower. > Emergency procedures, contacts, etc. > > Those type of things… > > From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] On Behalf Of > Jaime Solorza > Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 8:21 PM > To: Animal Farm > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tower Safety documents / policies > > > Proper training. Equipment must be in good conditions period. Never send a > climber up by himself. Must be a competent ground crew. Recent job in > Midland my son and I did is good example > They only wanted me to work on project to keep costs down. I said no and > they.hired us when I told them about safety and rescue issues. > > Jaime Solorza > On Jan 9, 2015 6:08 PM, "Paul McCall" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>> wrote: > It’s that time again… when someone asks what everyone is doing for tower > safety programs, meetings, policies, procedures. > > Googling around… it appears like safety in relation to what an employer > “should” be doing to meet OSHA and the 3 or 4 other “governing bodies of > tower experts” is a bit discouraging. > > My objective is to have a Document Procedure for a tower climber and crew > leader when they step on site, meaning a good checklist of everything > required to both meet the “requirements” and everything to keep them safe. > > I know some companies that have a certain level of inherent risk, like a > construction company, has regular safety meetings. I think that is great, > but I think it needs to be comprehensive. I don’t think I am alone in my > thoughts. > > Does anyone have any kind of materials they would be inclined to share with > the group… from documents, to policies and procedures? > > Paul > > > > Paul McCall, Pres. > PDMNet / Florida Broadband > 658 Old Dixie Highway > Vero Beach, FL 32962772-564-6800<tel:772-564-6800> > office772-473-0352<tel:772-473-0352> > cellwww.pdmnet.com<http://www.pdmnet.com/> > <http://www.pdmnet.com/>[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > > > -- All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
