I’m really not crazy about using LAG on backhaul links to get higher bandwidth. Most backhaul links are carrying traffic between two routers and there is no diversity in the MAC address or IP address, and the internal switches in a lot of the gear can’t look deep enough in the packet to consider UDP/TCP port. Even if they can all your port 80 traffic ends up on one side of the link.
An internal method in the radio tying 2 channels together is fine, but counting on LAG to evenly balance traffic across multiple links only works well where there is a lot of diversity in MAC and IP addresses. Mark > On Jan 14, 2015, at 9:02 AM, Daniel White <[email protected]> wrote: > > We get there with 2+0 LAG as well. > > 11GHz won’t be until March though. Dual 80MHz wide channels will net well > over 1.2Gbps without header compression. > > <image001.jpg> > Daniel White | Managing Director > SAF North America LLC > > Cell: > > (303) 746-3590 > Skype: > danieldwhite > E-mail: > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > > From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] On > Behalf Of Mike Hammett > Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 6:43 AM > To: Animal Farm > Subject: [AFMUG] 1 Gigabit Licensed Link > > The contenders are Dragonwave Quantum, Exalt ExtremeAir, Ceragon IP20, anyone > else? > > I know SIAE, SAF and maybe some others (which others if you have them?) can > get there with header compression. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com <http://www.ics-il.com/> > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
