That's a rumor I have heard as well.

On January 21, 2015 2:27:58 PM AKST, Jason McKemie 
<[email protected]> wrote:
>It's probably because they didn't originally design ePMP, just
>purchased it
>off of someone else (possibly Memorylink?)
>
>On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>> I can only see two logical reasons that they didn't do that - either
>it's
>> significantly cheaper to build an antenna in the ePMP form factor, or
>they
>> purposely didn't want them to work too well with Canopy
>accessories...
>> presumably to encourage people to upgrade FSK networks to 450
>instead.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Josh Luthman
><[email protected]
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> So you mean epmp guts put into the case they used for FSK, 430 and
>450?
>>> That would make way too much sense, though...
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Gino Villarini <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>   Sorry, epmp unit with SM like features (bracket and patch)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Gino A. Villarini
>>>> President
>>>> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
>>>> www.aeronetpr.com
>>>> @aeronetpr
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   From: Josh Luthman <[email protected]>
>>>> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>> Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 7:13 PM
>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?
>>>>
>>>>   What do you mean put in "epmp like unit"?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Josh Luthman
>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>> Suite 1337
>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Gino Villarini <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>   Josh, you are missing the whole point… I know this, but that
>combo
>>>>> dosnt yield good gain… maybe 15-16db total gain at best… also you
>need
>>>>> special adapters for it to work.
>>>>>
>>>>>  We need a direct replacement, remove SM, put Epmp like unit
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  Gino A. Villarini
>>>>> President
>>>>> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
>>>>> www.aeronetpr.com
>>>>> @aeronetpr
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   From: Josh Luthman <[email protected]>
>>>>> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>>> Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 7:00 PM
>>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?
>>>>>
>>>>>   Dude you can use the 27rd or KP reflectors with EPMP.  I believe
>the
>>>>> force 110 is better gain though.
>>>>>
>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>   On Jan 21, 2015 5:12 PM, "Gino Villarini" <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> no
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gino A. Villarini
>>>>>> President
>>>>>> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
>>>>>> www.aeronetpr.com
>>>>>> @aeronetpr
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/21/15, 3:00 PM, "John Woodfield" <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >Can't you use an epmp integrates on the 100 dish???
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >> On Jan 21, 2015, at 1:51 PM, Gino Villarini
><[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> So we are migrating some our Canopy 100 to epmpŠ primarily
>using the
>>>>>> >>Force110Š but I ponder, 99% of my PMP100 installs have dishesŠ
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Why cambium or anyone else has developed a simple bracket with
>a
>>>>>> dual
>>>>>> >>pol patch so we can put a conn. Epmp there and just swap a
>Canopy SM
>>>>>> >>with this contraption????
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> My techs could do a swap in 5 minutes instead of 30-45 min
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Gino A. Villarini
>>>>>> >> President
>>>>>> >> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
>>>>>> >> www.aeronetpr.com
>>>>>> >> @aeronetpr
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Reply via email to