Yea i am running 13.2 on eveything, and yes I know the ones with 20db varition 
probably have been idle. I have even seen them get full speed linktests while 
they showed the 20 db difference, i think it was a software glitch on the 
sessions page.

Sent from my iPhone

Kurt Fankhauser
Wavelinc Communications
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
http://www.wavelinc.com
tel. 419-562-6405
fax. 419-617-0110

> On Jan 23, 2015, at 7:13 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> The ones that are 20 dB difference, I would first run a couple linktests 
> through them to see if some data makes them read right, it might just be  
> cosmetic.
>  
> I would also makes sure you are on 13.2 (final) FW at both AP and SM.  I have 
> experienced strange things with mismatched 450 FW between AP and SM.  Also at 
> some point, I forget exactly where, I believe Cambium did something to get 
> the numbers and/or tone alignment to work better on a link with no data 
> flowing.
>  
>  
> From: Kurt Fankhauser
> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 3:43 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [AFMUG] pmp450 chain signal ratio variation
>  
> I have a 3.65ghz 450 AP with a 120 degree KPP sector that I suspect I have a 
> significant chain variation between Chain A and Chain B. What is more likely  
> to be the issue? A bad pigtail or a problem with the KPP sector? The AP has 
> been up for 6 months and it has had this problem since day 1 but lately it 
> seems to becoming worse. Most of the subs are only getting about half what 
> they should be getting on the link tests with the exception of some clients 
> that are more towards the center of the sector beam width they are getting 
> about 75% on the linktest. I attached a screenshot of my sessions page with 
> power levels. Any thoughts? I would replace the pigtails first but the 
> weather isn't exactly fit for climbing this particular tower.
>  
>  
> 
> Kurt Fankhauser
> Wavelinc Communications
> P.O. Box 126
> Bucyrus, OH 44820
> http://www.wavelinc.com
> tel. 419-562-6405
> fax. 419-617-0110

Reply via email to