I can't say which antenna is better at this point without testing them.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Matt <[email protected]> wrote: > So what do you use? > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Josh Luthman > <[email protected]> wrote: > > There's also panels. I've got both. > > > > Josh Luthman > > Office: 937-552-2340 > > Direct: 937-552-2343 > > 1100 Wayne St > > Suite 1337 > > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > On Jan 28, 2015 6:26 PM, "John Woodfield" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> Crud. Missed the 2.4 part. KP makes a reflector dish. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> John Woodfield Delmarva WiFi http://www.delmarvawifi.com cell (410) > >> 708-1937 > >> > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> > >> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 6:01pm > >> To: "af" <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 2.4 ePMP dishes > >> > >> Unfortunately, there isn't a Force dish available for 2.4ghz yet > though. > >> I haven't checked into it much, but my guess is wbmfg reflectors will be > >> your best option at this point. > >> > >> On Jan 28, 2015 4:54 PM, "John Woodfield" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Force dish with connectorized SM. No comparison to integrated. Apples > and > >>> Oranges. Think somebody here said 7 mile range on 5.1 with 14db TX > power. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> John Woodfield Delmarva WiFi http://www.delmarvawifi.com cell (410) > >>> 708-1937 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: "Jay Weekley" <[email protected]> > >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 5:48pm > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> Subject: [AFMUG] 2.4 ePMP dishes > >>> > >>> So. What is the preferred dish for 2.4 ePMP subscriber modules? What > >>> would be the expected improvement over a bare SM? >
