I hate cloned Macs because of factory defaults down the road, though in
this case it would have been fine since its going away in a short period
anyway
On Jan 28, 2015 9:03 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> wrote:

> This.
>
> This is why so many devices support mac cloning on their wan interface
>
> On January 28, 2015 5:59:11 PM AKST, Jeremy <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> I've always just cloned the old MAC to avoid dealing with the cable co.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 3:35 PM, John Woodfield <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Or Linktechs lol (sorry guys couldn't resist)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> John Woodfield Delmarva WiFi http://www.delmarvawifi.com cell (410)
>>> 708-1937
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 3:52pm
>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] cable modem question
>>>
>>>  As long as you're not my customer, yes.
>>>
>>>  Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 3:45 PM, That One Guy <[email protected]
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> So im golden for becoming the dick customer telling the tech what to do?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Josh Luthman <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sounds normal from what I remember, too.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Josh Luthman
>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 3:36 PM, John Woodfield <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, that is typical behavior for a cable modem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> John Woodfield Delmarva WiFi http://www.delmarvawifi.com cell (410)
>>>>>> 708-1937
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: "That One Guy" <[email protected]>
>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 3:34pm
>>>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>>>> Subject: [AFMUG] cable modem question
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  what i see with one provider is that when you start a cable modem
>>>>>> it is a DHCP server (motorola surfoboards) handing out a 192.168.100.x Ip
>>>>>> gatewaying to the management interface 192.168.100.1 of the modem.
>>>>>> After the device completes network entry it converts to a bridge and
>>>>>> you get your public IP space
>>>>>> i assume this is a common practice, but i dont know, we only deal
>>>>>> with one cable company around here.
>>>>>> I hate this joint because they MAC filter for static IP space, which
>>>>>> if fine and good, but its an up to 24 hour provisioning time to be able 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> switch out a firewall.
>>>>>> So today we went to go swap one prior to the provision, and after we
>>>>>> put in our device and restarted their cable modem, it would never hand us
>>>>>> anything other than the internal management range from the modem, like it
>>>>>> never completed network entry. Called them, and their tech said he could
>>>>>> see the physical connection, but no MAC. I kept telling him it was 
>>>>>> getting
>>>>>> handed the management range from the surfboard, he kept assuring me the
>>>>>> modem was strictly a bridge and contained no DHCP server ever at any 
>>>>>> point.
>>>>>> I finally told him to reprovision the device in their system, he said
>>>>>> it wouldnt o any good but complied. After restart it completed entry and 
>>>>>> we
>>>>>> got public IP assignment.
>>>>>> I assume network entry isnt the correct term for cable modems being
>>>>>> configured once they register to the network. But is this how its 
>>>>>> supposed
>>>>>> to work where the modem is a dhcp server (I assume i router) until the
>>>>>> cableco says otherwise to it? Its how Ive always seen it happen. At home
>>>>>> once, after a flood of DMCA hits, they blacklisted my modem and this was
>>>>>> the behavior, like their system refused to let it enter and convert to a
>>>>>> bridge.
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>  All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember
>>>>>> that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, 
>>>>>> if
>>>>>> you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, 
>>>>>> do
>>>>>> not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>  All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that
>>>> the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
>>>> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
>>>> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
>>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>

Reply via email to