makes you wonder!!! lol
----- Original Message -----
From: Bill Prince
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2015 12:46 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 25Mbps
Ah.
So TV is important enough to put up a tower, but internet is not. Is that
the story?
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 1/31/2015 10:43 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller wrote:
yes, you are indeed spot on sir. And you know, in this area, lots of
houses actually put up towers 30-40 years ago for TV.
----- Original Message -----
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2015 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 25Mbps
You can offer it right now in 2.4, 3.65 or 5.8, the customers just need
to pay the money for it and to cut trees and/or buy a big tower. A few people
are, the hard part is finding them...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "CBB - Jay Fuller" <[email protected]>
Sender: "Af" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 18:17:46 +0000
To: <[email protected]>
ReplyTo: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 25Mbps
me thinks if the FCC gave me 100 mhz from, oh, i don't know, 600 to 700
mhz, i could offer 25/3. Easily.
Give me what I want FCC!
----- Original Message -----
From: Jeremy
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 9:52 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 25Mbps
How many WISPs out there offer 25x3? What do you charge for it? Are
there bandwidth limits or is it unlimited? I'm trying to understand how we
could reliably provide this service without putting 5-10 customers per AP.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Travis Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
Minimum definition of "broadband" is now 25Mbps down and 3Mbps up. My
question is, if you say "up to", does that qualify? ;)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/01/29/fcc_sextuples_broadband_speed/
Travis
