Slightly better near los than 5 ghz. I'm using Powerbridges. Two links in them total. First one ran 5.2 for a looooong time, I upgraded after that security issue.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Feb 17, 2015 12:06 AM, "That One Guy" <[email protected]> wrote: > its going to work as well as any other standard band, just likely to have > less interference and less available channels with a power cap. The > question would be what product youre looking for. there isnt alot of ptp in > 3.65 out there. UBNT is always there, of you like m5 youll like m365. There > is no magic in the band. There are however ponies, and lots of them > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:01 PM, John Woodfield <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Does it work well? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> John Woodfield Delmarva WiFi http://www.delmarvawifi.com cell (410) >> 708-1937 >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 11:42pm >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ptp 3.65 >> >> That's the only case in which I've used it! :) >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> On Feb 16, 2015 11:40 PM, "John Woodfield" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Its getting increasingly harder to find clean 5ghz frequency to utilize. >>> Is it worth the aggravation for 3.65 in point to point? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> John Woodfield Delmarva WiFi http://www.delmarvawifi.com cell (410) >>> 708-1937 >>> >> > > > -- > All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the > parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you > can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not > use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >
