Of course the FCC cares! They just implemented those totally realistic OOBE limits on 5ghz! /sarcasm
-Ty On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: > Also spectrum reuse. With the narrow beam and O2 absorption, you can > have a lot of 60 GHz links in an area, all using the same frequencies. But > that argument is lost on the WiFi folks. And apparently the FCC folks, who > are enamored with shared use but not so much with only pointing your RF > where it is needed. > > > *From:* Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 17, 2015 9:23 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] curious, all the spectrums throughput > > Well it still needs a few constraints.... > > At a range of 3 feet I bet we can do better than 12 bits/hz and use 100ghz. > > > I guess i needed to define better > but the gist is of the usable spectrum probably less than 500gbps? > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: > >> What about Li-Fi? >> >> (it has to work, it’s from a TED talk) >> >> *From:* Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 17, 2015 8:23 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] curious, all the spectrums throughput >> >> At a distance of 10 miles during a rain storm? >> >> *From:* Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >> *Sent:* Monday, February 16, 2015 6:37 PM >> *To:* Animal Farm <af@afmug.com> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] curious, all the spectrums throughput >> >> >> So the 31ghz and 38ghz links I installed many years ago never passed >> data and phone calls? I knew I was kidding myself. >> >> Jaime Solorza >> On Feb 16, 2015 4:45 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >> >>> The entire radio spectrum is infinite in theory as all light, xrays >>> etc are all electromagnetic waves. >>> >>> The “usable” “RF” spectrum depends on range and rainfall and other >>> factors. >>> >>> While some will say that 60 GHz is usable and THz frequencies are >>> usable and free space optics in IR are usable I would limit the answer to >>> 24 GHz. >>> >>> So 24 x 12 bits per hz =288 Gbps. >>> >>> *From:* That One Guy <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>> *Sent:* Monday, February 16, 2015 4:19 PM >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] curious, all the spectrums throughput >>> >>> Theoretically, based on current bits/hz maximums, and assuming there >>> was a radio capable, and an antenna capable, with no other limitations. >>> What is the maximum throughput of the entire Radio spectrum not going too >>> far into details like processing overhead or any of that. >>> >>> -- >>> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that >>> the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you >>> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not >>> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >>> >> > > > -- > All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the > parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you > can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not > use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 > > >
