Does the software for the 3000 SU work on a 320 SM unmodified? Or did
Telrad have to make a special build for it?
Nathan from Wisper just explained the situation to our class of 56
here at WISPAmerica. I wish I'd recorded it. He explained just re-
flashing 320 SM connected to a Compact base station from the Motorola
software load to the TELRAD software load changed the SM performance
from reading 27 dBm output, yet being connected at lower modulations
to dBm readings of - 9 to +3, yet a achieving full modulation. Same SM
hardware. That's one example of just how much better even our firmware
is. Nick says that is related to the superiority of ATPC algorithm.
On Feb 23, 2015 8:58 AM, "That One Guy" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I had a popiel pocket fisherman
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Remember the Shamwow guy?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vince_Offer
Offer's "smooth-talking condescension" was more suited to
the present "zeitgeist" than the "earnest fervor" of spokesmen
like Mays and Ron Popeil.
I don’t know, I was always a sucker for Ron Popeil. Wait,
there’s more.
*From:* That One Guy <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Monday, February 23, 2015 8:28 AM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Grail or Gauntlet? ...or Maybe Just
"Powerpointware"?
This is reminiscent of that aggressive bald cambium sales rep,
insulting customers and making huge promises, I wonder what he
does now.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Gino Villarini
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
can’t compare LTE vs PMP450 protocol, 2 different beasts.
Even under same RF conditions (same Tx power, same Rx
sens) LTE will have better NLOS coverage.
Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com <http://www.aeronetpr.com>
@aeronetpr
From: Jason McKemie <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>"
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Monday, February 23, 2015 at 4:01 AM
To: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Grail or Gauntlet? ...or Maybe Just
"Powerpointware"?
I think "RF levels" is the key phrase here - a bit of
wordsmithing :)
On Monday, February 23, 2015, Josh Reynolds
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Sensitivity does not change the power level of the
received signal.
--
Josh Reynolds
CIO, SPITwSPOTS
www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com>
On 02/22/2015 08:42 PM, Patrick Leary wrote:
...also, seriously. You any like it's even possible
to compute a link budget without accounting for
sensitivity, MIMO scheme etc. Thinking dBm and dBi
are the only numbers in the equation has me wondering
how experienced you are Adam. You do realize don't
you it's impossible to understand link budget without
knowing a whole host of things besides the output
power and antenna gain?
On Feb 22, 2015 10:37 PM, "Adam Moffett"
<[email protected]> wrote:
I read that quote before Patrick, and I am forced
to wonder if that individual was in the United
States and running at the correct (legal) power
level. And I wonder if he was comparing the
naked 10dbi SM to a 15dbi wimax CPE. You could
definitely get 10db more by turning up the tx
power all the way and using a bigger antenna, and
maybe you can do some electronic magic to make a
little more out of the signal you're getting, but
there's no magic that makes more db's appear. If
both systems started with the legal +40dbm then
how does one end up with 10db more at the CPE?
I'm a skeptic by nature.
Testing back to back between Cambium and Telrad
products on the same tower at the same azimuth,
we found an average of 10dB better RF levels
with Telrad’s equipment."
--
All parts should go together without forcing. You must
remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled
by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there
must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM
maintenance manual, 1925
--
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember
that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you.
Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a
reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance
manual, 1925
