Is there frequency re-use with a 3 BTS setup? If there is re-use, what's the penalty?
On Tuesday, March 3, 2015, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > 3x 65s for 360* coverage. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Jason McKemie" <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> > *To: *[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > *Sent: *Tuesday, March 3, 2015 9:07:51 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] About $12k > > Is there a 90 degree sector or are you using 65 degree sectors in a 4 BTS > cluster? > > On Tuesday, March 3, 2015, Patrick Leary <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> Only 2 models, the 3.65 (actually 3.4-3.7) COMPACT 1000 or the 2.x (2.3 >> and 2.5) COMPACT 3000. I included the 3.65 version. The 2.5 is all the >> same, save for the BTS price, which is about $5k higher (but 40 dBm per >> port and 43 pounds of brute power, compared to the 18 pound COMPACT 1000) >> >> >> >> *Patrick Leary* >> >> *M* 727.501.3735 >> >> <http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet> >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie >> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:36 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] About $12k >> >> >> >> Which base station are you quoting, and what are the basic differences >> between the models? >> >> On Tuesday, March 3, 2015, Patrick Leary <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Think of all the EPC options (and there are 3 forms) as shells: >> >> >> >> 1 is an shell embedded as a piece of software inside EACH BTS...a total >> one box solution (we can do that since we are a SDR). >> >> 1 is a shell that's a small (1/2U) appliance supporting up to 10k subs >> and 2 gigs. These are stackable and with our NPV option is infinitely >> stackable. >> >> >> >> Into each shell option you plug in ONLY the functionality you need: >> >> >> >> Connecting to an external Radius? Buy that module. Don't need to? Don't >> get it. >> >> If not above, then doing MAC level authentication instead? Buy the iHSSS >> module. >> >> PCRF module. Doing service flows and dedicated bearers? Get that. Don't, >> then don't. >> >> Need Layer 2, get that. Don't? Dont. >> >> >> >> These modules are in price relative to the version of EPC (baby, momma or >> papa bear size). >> >> >> >> *Patrick Leary* >> >> *M* 727.501.3735 >> >> <http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet> >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie >> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:23 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] About $12k >> >> >> >> Never mind, I see that now. How much is the 50 user license? >> >> On Tuesday, March 3, 2015, Jason McKemie < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> Is the 50 user limit just a guideline or a software limitation? >> >> On Tuesday, March 3, 2015, Patrick Leary <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> One BTS, included embedded EPC with MAC level authentication (cheapest >> option) supporting up to 50 clients. Antenna could be swapped for any >> other. NOTE: this exclude any NMS pieces, but you could just connect over >> Telnet or direct connect. This would be the BAREST of bones, but there it >> is. That's still LTE and about 100 Mbps with killer NLOS. >> >> >> >> Includes: >> >> >> >> 735270 >> >> CMP.XT-BS-3.4-3.7 >> >> 1 >> >> 715773 >> >> LTE COMPACT SW License >> >> 1 >> >> 700258 >> >> BMAX-4M-GPS >> >> 1 >> >> 300736 >> >> ANT 3.3-3.8GHz,18 dBi, 65deg, 4ports >> (RF cables NOT included) >> >> 1 >> >> 715620 >> >> BreezeWay-1010-50 >> (per Compact HW license) >> >> 1 >> >> 715621 >> >> BreezeWay-1010-iHSS-50 >> (50 subs. license) >> >> 1 >> >> SLA >> >> 1 Year SLA >> >> 1 >> >> >> >> >> >> *Patrick Leary* >> >> *M* 727.501.3735 >> >> <http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet> >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Patrick Leary >> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:08 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] New feedback >> >> >> >> No, could be much less. Give me a minute... >> >> >> >> *Patrick Leary* >> >> *M* 727.501.3735 >> >> <http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet> >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman >> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:05 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] New feedback >> >> >> >> Probably 20k to start. Quality over quantity. >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Mar 3, 2015 8:56 PM, "John Woodfield" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Patrick, >> >> >> >> I haven't had time to read through all this emails. Can you summarize >> what the lowest cost get up and running on a tower is so I can consider >> this further along with cost per sub? >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> John Woodfield, President >> >> Delmarva WiFi Inc. >> >> 410-870-WiFi >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: "Patrick Leary" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 8:41pm >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback >> >> Alvarion did that. I admit, I'm not a fan of capping Glen. It is a >> gimmick. The hardware is what it is, and this hardware is expensive. 30dBm >> per port. 4 tx/4rx. Power is expensive. The highest quality DSPs on the >> market. not consumer grade stuff with the sensitivity of your in home Wi-Fi >> router. We build our own phy from the ground up too, our own ATPC >> algorithms too. >> >> >> >> On the software, we do that though -- enabling modularity and scale as >> you need to. I think I need to do a dedicated webinar to this community to >> walk you guys (or those inclined) through it (any takers?). I do not think >> we can be a solution that makes sense where you only have 15 clients. >> That's the blunt truth. Unless you are doing 50 Mbps customers, I am not >> your micropop (but I can do that in some modest scale). That said, I wonder >> where that 15 number comes from? Can you please explain on what >> architecture that is based? Range? Height? Etc. If it is based on a >> micropop and even then on what just that pop can see, I'd say that's likely >> a model invented out of necessity due to the poor performance of the system >> you are using. >> >> >> >> I had a guy on a call today. He zoomed me in on Google Earth to his >> "NLOS" area. Farmland with wind breaks and shade trees for the homes. He is >> at 400' and can't connect squat behind those breaks. In my world, that's >> LOS all the way, even at 150 ft. It is total garbage that so many systems >> to can't deal with that and you've all been fed that that is "normal." It >> is not. It is just gear with terrible specs where the only R&D is at the >> software level, and even that is scant. ....You do not have NLOS problems. >> You have equipment problems. How such a product ever was allowed to go to >> market as a "solution" for rural broadband is, to me, cynical and >> reflective of playing a market to skim opportunistic dollars from a market >> segment that sometimes seems to embrace abuse. Sort of like the poor 700 >> MHz owners who got sucked in to buying 20 year old Marconi WipLL repackaged >> as a 700 MHz "solution" because all there was to buy. Then vendors do that >> crap and THEN, THEN tell you there's no backward compatibility when they >> come out with something new? >> >> >> >> WISPs. Sometimes you guys drive me nuts. You are like cheerleaders that >> love to date the quarterbacks who abuse you. That is like selling a car >> that falls apart once you leave residential streets. None of you should >> ever have accepted these golf carts to run your fleets. Sometimes, cheap is >> just cheap. >> >> >> >> Boy, I'm gonna hear it from my vendor peers, but this ain't a game or >> just a job for me. I damn sure hope it ain't that for you either. >> >> >> >> *Patrick Leary* >> >> *M* 727.501.3735 >> >> <http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Glen Waldrop >> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2015 8:08 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] New feedback >> >> >> >> Sort of off topic, but what would be the smallest AP we could get? >> >> I'm thinking about using this system on a few of my towers to make sure >> we never leave without a new customer, but I serve a very rural area. >> >> I have some towers with 15 clients. >> >> Is an omni + GPS sync or narrow channel out of the question? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> *From:* Patrick Leary >> >> *To:* [email protected] ; [email protected] >> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2015 4:42 PM >> >> *Subject:* [AFMUG] New feedback >> >> >> >> This is an interesting bit of commentary from one of our new customers. >> If he wishes to identify himself, he will.... >> >> >> >> *Patrick Leary* >> >> *M* 727.501.3735 >> >> <http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* >> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2015 2:31 AM >> *To:* Patrick Leary; Nick Dewar >> *Subject:* Interesting Statistic >> >> >> >> "Patrick / Nick – >> >> >> >> Our Director of Operations, which you both met in St Louis, sent out an >> interesting email to our staff this evening. In February with only 20 >> working days we completed 40 installs with one technician... This is >> only icing on the cake, especially since we are onboarding two more techs. >> .. I ran some additional numbers and found that out of the “Telrad” >> installations that we scheduled, 100 % were successful both of these >> months. This is a game changer, and it proves that we can eliminate the >> need to waste further time with the dreaded site surveys. Our success is >> not without the help of Telrad’s Compact solution. Truly amazing and >> inspiring, excited for our aggressive expansion this spring/summer/fall. I >> cannot wait to have hundreds of these damn things in the air. >> >> >> >> Excited and thankful to be a part of the LTE Beta, and am thankful for >> the “Holy Grail” email that introduced us to the product...." >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by >> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & >> computer viruses. >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by >> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & >> computer viruses. >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by >> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & >> computer viruses. >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> >> >> >> >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by >> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & >> computer viruses. >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by >> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & >> computer viruses. >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by >> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & >> computer viruses. >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by >> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & >> computer viruses. >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> >> >> >> >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by >> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & >> computer viruses. >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by >> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & >> computer viruses. >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> >> >> >> >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by >> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & >> computer viruses. >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> >> >> >> >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by >> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & >> computer viruses. >> >> ************************************************************************************ >> >> >
