He's (glen)  between ttown and Montgomery patrick

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone

----- Reply message -----
From: "Glen Waldrop" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [AFMUG] New feedback
Date: Tue, Mar 3, 2015 11:10 PM
Tree density is seriously mixed.Some places 
it is ridiculous, 100+ year growth, old forests. Nearly half of my coverage 
area 
is over farmland (beef, catfish) so those places are usually an easy 
shot.

The truly irritating thing about wireless in this 
area is cedar trees. There won't be one tree in the yard, but there will 
almost always be a line of cedar across the road or something, somewhere near a 
fence line. Anyone that has the phobia that RF is killing us just needs to 
plant cedar.

I've got a few places that if your system could 
serve you'd get a shining recommendation from me. Nothing short of going over 
cedar seems to work. 900MHz seems to get a half mile or less if cedar is
involved. I can get over a mile away with the test AP on the ground and a yagi 
in my truck through hardwood and pine, but cedar just stops it cold.Mike 
Hammet may have a point though. I may not be your target audience. I might not 
get a return on my investment, but it would be irresponsible of me to 
not evaluate another tool to find out.



----- Original Message ----- 
From: 
Patrick Leary 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 10:48 
PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback


I suspect you could pull off 
omnis then. How's the tree density?






Patrick 
Leary
M 
727.501.3735 












From: Af 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Glen WaldropSent: 
Tuesday, March 03, 2015 10:19 PMTo: [email protected]: Re: [AFMUG] New 
feedback


The 15 number comes 
from rural area. I have some towers that can only hit a few homes. Of those 
few, some still have OTA TV and rotary phones. They have no need nor want for 
Internet. Don't get hung up on that.



I'm looking at 
probably 4 of these strategically placed in my network to cover any blind 
spots I might have over my coverage area.

I'm not 
following, "capping"?Aside from that, this email came off more than a 
bit condesending.






----- Original 
Message ----- 

From: Patrick Leary 


To: [email protected] 


Sent: Tuesday, March 
03, 2015 7:41 PM

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New 
feedback


Alvarion did that. I admit, 
I'm not a fan of capping Glen. It is a gimmick. The hardware is what it is, 
and this hardware is expensive. 30dBm per port. 4 tx/4rx. Power is 
expensive. The highest quality DSPs on the market. not consumer grade stuff 
with the sensitivity of your in home Wi-Fi router. We build our own phy from 
the ground up too, our own ATPC algorithms too. 

On the software, we do that 
though -- enabling modularity and scale as you need to. I think I need to do 
a dedicated webinar to this community to walk you guys (or those inclined) 
through it (any takers?). I do not think we can be a solution that makes 
sense where you only have 15 clients. That's the blunt truth. Unless you are 
doing 50 Mbps customers, I am not your micropop (but I can do that in some 
modest scale). That said, I wonder where that 15 number comes from? Can you 
please explain on what architecture that is based? Range? Height? Etc. If it 
is based on a micropop and even then on what just that pop can see, I'd say 
that's likely a model invented out of necessity due to the poor performance 
of the system you are using.

I had a guy on a call today. 
He zoomed me in on Google Earth to his "NLOS" area. Farmland with wind 
breaks and shade trees for the homes. He is at 400' and can't connect squat 
behind those breaks. In my world, that's LOS all the way, even at 150 ft. It 
is total garbage that so many systems to can't deal with that and you've all 
been fed that that is "normal." It is not. It is just gear with terrible 
specs where the only R&D is at the software level, and even that is 
scant. ....You do not have NLOS problems. You have equipment problems. How 
such a product ever was allowed to go to market as a "solution" for rural 
broadband is, to me, cynical and reflective of playing a market to skim 
opportunistic dollars from a market segment that sometimes seems to embrace 
abuse. Sort of like the poor 700 MHz owners who got sucked in to buying 20 
year old Marconi WipLL repackaged as a 700 MHz "solution" because all there 
was to buy. Then vendors do that crap and THEN, THEN tell you there's no 
backward compatibility when they come out with something new? 


WISPs. Sometimes you guys 
drive me nuts. You are like cheerleaders that love to date the quarterbacks 
who abuse you. That is like selling a car that falls apart once you leave 
residential streets. None of you should ever have accepted these golf carts 
to run your fleets. Sometimes, cheap is just cheap.

Boy, I'm gonna hear it from 
my vendor peers, but this ain't a game or just a job for me. I damn sure 
hope it ain't that for you either.






Patrick 
Leary
M 
727.501.3735 












From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Glen WaldropSent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 8:08 
PMTo: [email protected]: Re: [AFMUG] 
New feedback


Sort of off 
topic, but what would be the smallest AP we could get?I'm thinking 
about using this system on a few of my towers to make sure we never leave 
without a new customer, but I serve a very rural area.I have some 
towers with 15 clients.Is an omni + GPS sync or narrow channel out 
of the question?








----- Original 
Message ----- 

From: Patrick Leary 


To: [email protected] 
; [email protected] 


Sent: Tuesday, March 
03, 2015 4:42 PM

Subject: [AFMUG] New 
feedback


This is an interesting bit 
of commentary from one of our new customers. If he wishes to identify 
himself, he will....






Patrick 
Leary
M 
727.501.3735 












From: 

Sent: Tuesday, 
March 03, 2015 2:31 AMTo: Patrick Leary; Nick 
DewarSubject: Interesting 
Statistic

"Patrick / Nick 
–

Our Director of Operations, which you both met in St 
Louis, sent out an interesting email to our staff this evening. In
February with only 20 working days we completed 40 installs with one 
technician... This is only icing on 
the cake, especially since we are onboarding two more techs... I ran some 
additional numbers and found 
that out of the “Telrad” installations that we scheduled, 100 % were 
successful both of these months. This is a game changer, and it proves 
that we can eliminate the need to waste further time with the dreaded site 
surveys.  Our success is not without the help of Telrad’s Compact 
solution.  Truly amazing and inspiring, excited for our aggressive 
expansion this spring/summer/fall.  I cannot wait to have hundreds of 
these damn things in the air.  

Excited and thankful to be a part of the LTE Beta, and 
am thankful for the “Holy Grail” email that introduced us to the 
product...."

************************************************************************************This
 
footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned byPineApp 
Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.************************************************************************************
************************************************************************************This
 
footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned byPineApp 
Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.************************************************************************************
************************************************************************************This
 
footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned byPineApp 
Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.************************************************************************************
************************************************************************************This
 
footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned byPineApp 
Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
viruses.************************************************************************************************************************************************************************This
 
footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned byPineApp 
Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
viruses.************************************************************************************

Reply via email to