Meant to say "horribly inefficient" and I mean it specifically within shared 
bands. If people want to agg in their own bought bands, that is to me 
different. Problem then though is, what size channel is too big? That's a 
judgment question and one technology can solve to certain extents.

Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
[cid:[email protected]]<http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet>





From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 9:08 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [Telrad] LTE Categories

Both Nick and I are in agreement with you on that front. Carrier aggregation is 
a horribly way to use spectrum. Things like MU-MIMO are far better approaches. 
Carrier agg is the technically lazy, cheap (as in R&D cheap) and band-hosing 
method to increase capacity.

Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
[cid:[email protected]]<http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet>





From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 8:54 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Telrad] LTE Categories

Softbank\Sprint push heavily on the B41 front. 8T8R makes 2.5 perform similarly 
to 1.9 regarding range. CA doesn't get me as excited as a lot of people...  
just light up more channels and push people around.


-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

[Image removed by sender.]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[Image removed by 
sender.]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[Image 
removed by 
sender.]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[Image
 removed by sender.]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
________________________________
From: "Gino Villarini" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 7:49:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Telrad] LTE Categories
Verizon is banking heavily on CA with 5 and 3.5 Ghz.. That would help in the 
push….

But in Band 41, there are plenty of chipsets – its a very popular band in China 
and Japan, among others like US (Sprint) I would love to see better CAT support 
on band 41 CPES



Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com<http://www.aeronetpr.com>
@aeronetpr



From: Mike Hammett <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Friday, March 6, 2015 at 9:19 AM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [Telrad] LTE Categories

*nods* Makes sense. The latest phones (as in not released yet) can do 3x 20 MHz 
carrier aggregation. Not currently possible in 3.65, but would be in a 3550 
world.


-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

[Image removed by sender.]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[Image removed by 
sender.]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[Image 
removed by 
sender.]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[Image
 removed by sender.]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
________________________________
From: "Patrick Leary" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 7:16:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Telrad] LTE Categories
I think it more relates to the band. It is all about mass. As I have shared 
with many, I think that changes fast with the advent of 3.55 GHz.

Patrick Leary
M727.501.3735
[cid:[email protected]]<http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet>





From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 8:11 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [Telrad] LTE Categories

The mobile world has category 9 and category 10 chipsets. Why is the fixed 
world so behind? (Honest question.)


-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

[Image removed by sender.]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[Image removed by 
sender.]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[Image 
removed by 
sender.]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[Image
 removed by sender.]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL>




************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
************************************************************************************




************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
************************************************************************************


_______________________________________________
Telrad mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad


_______________________________________________
Telrad mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad





************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
************************************************************************************




************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
************************************************************************************





************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
************************************************************************************

 
 
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
************************************************************************************

Reply via email to