I want to say that's the exact same problem I was seeing the other day.
Chrome kept freaking out saying connection lost or something like that,
and it was only happening when going through Cacti pages. Closed/reopen
Chrome, reboot my PC, and then... a couple hours later, it just went
away. I assume the Google changed some crap and messed it up like they
usually do. I don't know how to force gupdate to run. So I just did
something else for a while because it was pissing me off. I hate it,
it's a memory hog and uses lots of CPU cycles. But it lets me have all
of my bookmarks and passwords sync'd across all devices and PCs.
My version is the same as yours currently. This was a couple days ago
too. So I'm not sure that has anything to do with it. Have you tried
Chrome on another PC?
But Thursday night, I also migrated my Cacti over to a new machine. The
old one started running dogshit slow a couple months ago. I found out
that one of the CPUs sorta half failed. One of the logical processors,
aka hyper-threads, will not start. The kernel says "CPU not responding -
cannot use it" at boot. And I think that socket is also tied to the half
of the PCI bus that runs the RAID controller slot. The thing is well
over 10 years old, so it got some good life. The new machine is dual
socket with 6-core Hyper-threaded Xeons each and lots more RAM. It's..
fast. I get a 30 graph page in under 2 seconds now. It would take like 2
minutes to get a net-flow report, now it's about 5 seconds.
On 3/7/2015 2:23 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
For about the last week, I've been seeing extremely _S_L_O_W_ graph
rendering in cacti, but only when I use a chrome browser. Both firefox
and IE at least 10X faster. An average subscriber with 8 graphs takes
about 1 second if the browser is firefox or IE, but chrome takes
something like 20 seconds; sometimes even longer (one time ~~ 45 seconds).
I thought maybe it was an extension or something, so I turned off
extensions and stripped it down to next to nothing. No help. So I am
guessing this is some issue with the way that rrdtool renders the
graph(s) and the way that chrome interprets it or something.
When I do the operation in either firefox or IE, the CPU utilization
goes up for a brief little blip. When rendering in chrome, CPU
utilization goes up to ~~ 50-60% and stays there until the page is
rendered; 20, 30, sometimes 40 seconds. I also get timeout notices
from chrome. I tell it to "wait", and eventually the page is rendered....
My setup:
Windows 8.1 x64 (whatever the latest update is)
chrome Version 41.0.2272.76 m (64-bit)
firefox Version 36.0.1
--
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>