Two different techs.
WDS Bridging != WDS Repeating
Yeah, I have no idea why UBNT decided to label Layer2 mode as WDS mode. It definitely creates a bit of confusion for people. There is actually no WDS repeating taking place in this scenario.On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Jerry Richardson <[email protected]> wrote:WDS repeater mode cuts the throughput.
In this case WDS is allowing the MAC address of the device behind it to pass through.
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 8:26 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] UBNT Station to Station performance
Definitely not.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373On Mar 9, 2015 11:23 AM, "Jeremy" <[email protected]> wrote:
WDS definitely does not halve the bandwidth of the clients.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Vince West <[email protected]> wrote:
Doing the separate links would be the best option. You have a little more control over the quality of each link as opposed to one link possibly bringing down the whole AP.
I am not really sure WDS is going to help you much. WDS mostly provides L2 access, if you CPE is a bridged CPE. I am not sure you will see much benefit from WDS. I thought, and I could be wrong, that WDSing all the clients on one AP halves the bandwidth of the clients. I could be wrong.
Vince West
Tower Hand
Technical Support
Shelby Broadband
148 Citizens Blvd
Simpsonville, KY 40067
Phone: 1-888-364-4232
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Jerry Richardson <[email protected]> wrote:
What is the distance and angle from the stations to the AP? Also, the pattern on the antenna is pretty wide, LOS is pretty important. If they are too low on the roofline they will not perform well
Yes WDS makes a difference but not that much.
-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 7:21 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [AFMUG] UBNT Station to Station performance
I'm looking at a site where somebody has installed three UBNT M5 stations pointing at a UBNT M5 AP. Performance station to station is important for this customer, and it kind of sucks.
I'm suggesting that we replace the whole thing with three separate point to point links, but in the short term will I get better performance from site to site if I change the stations into WDS APs? My feeling is "probably", but I wonder if someone who's already done this can tell me.
