I would imagine those 6 ports can service 600 customers On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote:
> LABEL LABEL LABEL. ALWAYS. Those million wires blur together instantly. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Mar 10, 2015 1:49 PM, "Sam Lambie" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> A 48 port DSLAM is about $1200. It looks like its about 1k for 6 ports on >> the coax. It takes a little bit to learn how to best manage to twisted >> pairs, but once you got it down, it's easy. Just make sure you label the >> pairs! Just my 2 Cents. >> >> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I would think you would have an easier time using the coax than >>> twisted pair. But yeah, DSLAM or DOCSIS CMTS would both work. CMTS should >>> be cheap if you go with an older level of DOCSIS. >>> >>> Here is one for $999.95 >>> http://www.ebay.com/itm/like/261799840588?lpid=82&chn=ps >>> >>> *From:* Sam Lambie <[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:35 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Coax retransmit >>> >>> What about a DSLAM? Is there a common phone board somewhere in the >>> building that you could tap into? 1 Antenna or hard line to a router and >>> the DSLAM and voila! Totally controllable service per user. I do it all the >>> time in apt buildings. >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> This is a bit different problem. >>>> >>>> I think the google search you are looking for is "MoCA". There are a >>>> lot of options for data over coax in a distribution environment. >>>> >>>> Also don't discount something like HomePNA which is a dsl-like >>>> technology you could tap onto a phone line post-demarc. >>>> >>>> -forrest >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Brett A Mansfield < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> It's a massive several hundred unit apartment complex. It's >>>>> privately owned and they refuse to let anyone put any kind of radio or >>>>> dish >>>>> on their roof. It's three levels. If be able to get a signal to a few on >>>>> the top level, but none on any other level. My hope is that if I can get a >>>>> hardline to the building (which the city will allow me to do) then I can >>>>> tie into the existing coax and distribute that way. The problem is that I >>>>> have no idea how to do that. The building owner will not let anyone (not >>>>> even Comcast or century link) run any new lines that are not already >>>>> there. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you, >>>>> Brett A Mansfield >>>>> >>>>> On Mar 9, 2015, at 1:42 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Are you sure? >>>>> >>>>> In addition, antennas covered by the rule may be mounted on "masts" to >>>>> reach the height needed to receive or transmit an acceptable quality >>>>> signal >>>>> (e.g. maintain line-of-sight contact with the transmitter or view the >>>>> satellite). Masts higher than 12 feet above the roofline may be subject >>>>> to >>>>> local permitting requirements for safety purposes. Further, masts that >>>>> extend beyond an exclusive use area may not be covered by this rule. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> OTARD would only apply to their balcony, not the roof. Well, >>>>>> assuming by apartment he doesn't mean duplex or town home which have >>>>>> exclusive use areas that would cover the roof. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- >>>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> *From: *"Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >>>>>> *To: *[email protected] >>>>>> *Sent: *Monday, March 9, 2015 2:34:03 PM >>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Coax retransmit >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> OTARD. You win legally. But I wouldn't start a fight/war. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Brett A Mansfield < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't know if anyone has ever had this issue before, but has >>>>>>> anyone ever had an apartment complex where they wouldn't let you >>>>>>> install a >>>>>>> radio on the roof? The next option is to put it on the balcony, but >>>>>>> then I >>>>>>> have no LOS. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I thought put one radio in a hidden spot, but they won't let me run >>>>>>> any cables to each apartment. However, they already have coax to each >>>>>>> apartment. Anyone know what I could buy to get my ubiquiti radio signal >>>>>>> covered to coax to bring them the Internet? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>>> Brett A Mansfield >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> -- >>> *Sam Lambie* >>> Taosnet Wireless Tech. >>> 575-758-7598 Office >>> www.Taosnet.com <http://www.newmex.com> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> -- >> *Sam Lambie* >> Taosnet Wireless Tech. >> 575-758-7598 Office >> www.Taosnet.com <http://www.newmex.com> >> >
