I would expect SSH to get hit worse than telnet.

From: Steve D 
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 12:04 AM
To: af 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] SM crashes are getting really old - enough with 
thedeadbeef already

Can't speak for the ePmp because we have none, (and I don't know if 450 is 
afflicted because ours is managed in private network only) but FSK and public 
IP do not mix unless you set the ACL to your NOC or block telnet at head of 
your network.  Script kiddies just hammer telnet trying to break in and the FSK 
don't handle it well and just stack dump and reboot, typically on a ten minute 
basis or thereabouts.  Firmware version doesn't matter.  I never saw the 
wireshark dump from the guys troubleshooting it, but I was told the telnet 
requests hitting the things were staggering. 

The next beta for the 450's has a no telnet, ssh only option if I recall.  
Whether that definitively fixes the problem or not though is yet to be seen - 
not holding our breath for it to trickle to FSK anyway.

I don't have any event logs handy to compare, and it's the only thing similar 
to Mark's problem I've seen that has "recently" started causing radios to do 
this for us.  I dunno, maybe it's a 13.2.1 thing too.  /shrug

-Steve D

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:15 PM, John Woodfield <[email protected]> wrote:

  Like this one?



  http://208.74.35.70/



  John Woodfield, President

  Delmarva WiFi Inc.

  410-870-WiFi



  -----Original Message-----
  From: "Steve D" <[email protected]>
  Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 10:43pm
  To: "af" <[email protected]>
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] SM crashes are getting really old - enough with 
thedeadbeef already



  Publicly accessible IP on the radio?

  On Mar 10, 2015 6:50 PM, "Mark Radabaugh" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Probably a good guess.   Seems to have arrived after 13.1.3.  Affects some 
customers pretty regularly, others not at all.   Given that we use NAT for 
nearly everyone it accounts for a fair number of customers.

    Mark

    On 3/10/15 9:35 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
      I don’t know how to read the stack dumps but does “Current context Task: 
NAPT” mean this only occurs when using NAT in the SM?

      From: Mark Radabaugh
      Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 8:26 PM
      To: [email protected]
      Subject: [AFMUG] SM crashes are getting really old - enough with 
thedeadbeef already

      Dear Cambium,

      Can we please get this SM issue fixed?   It's getting really old.


      System Reset Exception -- Watchdog Reset Cur ExtInt 0 Max ExtInt 0 Cur 
DecInt 0 Max DecInt 0 Cur Sync 0 Max Sync 0 Cur LED 2 Max LED 1 Cur WDOG 0 Max 
WDOG 1 Cur EthXcvr 0 Max EthXcvr 1 Cur FEC 0 Max FEC 0 Cur FPGA 18 Max FPGA 
1663 Cur FrmLoc 0 Max FrmLoc 0 Cur WatchDog 33 Max WatchDog 33 RTMLogStats 0 
AAState 0 
      Software Version : CANOPY 13.2.1 SM-DES
      Board Type : P11
      Device Setting : 5.4/5.7GHz MIMO OFDM - Subscriber Module - 
0a-00-3e-a0-4c-a7
      FPGA Version : 081514
      FPGA Features : DES, Sched;
      03/10/2015 : 15:28:31 EDT : :Timezone set to EDT;
      03/10/2015 : 15:32:57 EDT : :Delete Public Entry Protocol 17 Failed
      03/10/2015 : 15:32:57 EDT : :Delete Private Entry Protocol 17 Failed
      03/10/2015 : 15:54:39 EDT : :Tsl Free list empty. Entries 0
      03/10/2015 : 15:54:39 EDT : :FatalError()
      03/10/2015 : 15:54:39 EDT : 
      Stack Dump information: 
      Current context Task: NAPT 
      Current Stack: 2% 
      Max Stack: 26% 
      r0: 00000000 r1: deadbeef r2: 00000002 r3: 00000000
      r4: 007930a4 r5: 00000000 r6: 00000000 r7: fffffffe
      r8: 00bc3380 r9: 00000006 r10: 00000000 r11: 00000001
      r12: 00bf1380 r13: 00000000 r14: 96904e99 r15: 08001b3c
      r16: 00000000 r17: 0236080e r18: 02360800 r19: 45acd86f
      r20: 00bc3380 r21: 02360822 r22: 02360822 r23: 00000000
      r24: 009eb434 r25: deadbeef r26: 004f2370 r27: 009ee000
      r28: 00000000 r29: 000981e0 r30: deadbeef r31: 00029a64
      Task Stack Dump: 
      0x009edf18: 0000001d 000981e0 0000001e deadbeef 
      Mark 




    -- Mark Radabaugh Amplex [email protected] 419.837.5015 x 1021 

Reply via email to