Uh 25dbi in 5 ghz with a connectorized radio. I'm talking 16 dbi on a connectorized 2g radio.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 13, 2015 10:16 PM, "Jay Weekley" <[email protected]> wrote: > Do you know what the improvement over a bare sm? 16 to 18 db? Cambium says > their dish will do 25 db over a bare sm. Would you trust that number? > > Josh Luthman wrote: > >> >> 16 or 18? >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Mar 13, 2015 9:56 PM, "Jay Weekley" <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> What is the gain on those panels? >> >> Josh Luthman wrote: >> >> >> Sometime...but ITelite has panels now so... >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340> >> Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343> >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Mar 13, 2015 9:19 PM, "Jay Weekley" >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> <mailto:[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: >> >> I'm holding my breath for the 2.4 connectorized dish >> Cambium is >> releasing. Isn't that this month? >> >> Josh Luthman wrote: >> >> >> Remote is coming. >> >> Are you doing epmp on both bands on the dual band itelite? >> Have you checked signal to make sure 2g carries >> farther than 5g? >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340u >> Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343> >> <tel:937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>> >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Mar 13, 2015 9:11 PM, "Paul McCall" >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>> >> wrote: >> >> We have mostly been using the Cambium sectors, but >> just >> started >> using the ITElite model that does both 2.4 and 5 >> Ghz on same >> sector. A/B comparison was pretty much identical >> compared to >> Cambium on the 2.4 Ghz side and slightly stronger >> on the 5 >> Ghz side. >> >> eDetect has its shortcomings. It only picks up >> 801.11 >> devices on >> same frequency. ePMP doesn’t have remote >> spectrum analyzer >> which would be helpful. (unless it was just added) >> >> *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> <mailto:[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> <mailto:[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> <mailto:[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>>>] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman >> *Sent:* Friday, March 13, 2015 9:04 PM >> *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Any success with 2.4 ePMP? >> >> Are you using the suggested sectors, Paul? >> >> Should eDetect see TDD and wifi devices? >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340> >> <tel:937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>> <tel:937-552-2340 >> <tel:937-552-2340> >> <tel:937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>>> >> Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343> >> <tel:937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>> <tel:937-552-2343 >> <tel:937-552-2343> >> <tel:937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>>> >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Mar 13, 2015 8:45 PM, "Paul McCall" >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>> wrote: >> >> We have about 250 2.4 SMs deployed with pretty good >> success. Where we have had some issues are... >> >> 1) direct competitor interference in the band. It does >> "OK" but >> FSK seemed to do much better at it, but probably >> because >> of the >> lesser SNR requirements as much as the >> modulation. One >> tower out >> of 10 has this issue for us. >> 2) highly concentrated neighborhoods where the >> neighbors house >> with his wiz-bang overkill home router causes gried. >> >> TIPS: >> 1) Use Mikrotik routers EVERYWHERE, EVERY >> customer... to >> control >> the 2.4 "local" environment as much as possible, >> scan for >> problems >> etc. >> 2) Be conscious about what Frequency boxes are >> checked in the >> SMs. Obviously avoid the frequency you have the >> router at. >> If you don't have a second AP that has a >> good enough >> signal (-65 or less) and the customer is NOT on >> the edge of a >> sector, you can keep the second frequency checked >> If you have a poor "second AP" signal OR >> you have a >> customer installed on a sector edge, check ONLY >> the one >> frequency >> of the "good" (proper angled) AP >> >> Doing this, your eDedects will be happy, and you give >> yourself the >> best chance for success. We actually are writing >> some SNMP >> backend stuff to help point out problems in all these >> areas, and >> proactively "fix" them >> >> Paul >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Af [mailto:[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> <mailto:[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> <mailto:[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> <mailto:[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>>>] On Behalf Of George Skorup >> (Cyber >> Broadcasting) >> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 8:29 PM >> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Any success with 2.4 ePMP? >> >> Haven't even bought any. We're thinking about not even >> buying any more >> 2.4 450. It's just too noisy. All the wifi in >> neighborhoods, >> customer's router interfering with the SM, etc. It's >> pretty much >> as horrible as 900 these days. >> >> And if we don't get to keep 5.7 ISM.. things are >> gonna get >> shitty. >> 3GHz is the only place to go, so we're gonna be >> doing a >> bunch more >> of it this year. >> >> On 3/13/2015 6:48 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >> > I've heard of several networks having problems >> with it >> for one >> reason >> > or another, generally the inability to coexist with >> FSK. Does >> any one >> > network have some success with them? >> > >> > Josh Luthman >> > Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340> >> <tel:937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>> >> <tel:937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340> <tel:937-552-2340 >> <tel:937-552-2340>>> >> > Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343> >> <tel:937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>> >> <tel:937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343> <tel:937-552-2343 >> <tel:937-552-2343>>> >> > 1100 Wayne St >> > Suite 1337 >> > Troy, OH 45373 >> >> >> >> >
