Clearly going in ready for a fight. All the references to "the commenters"....and every single one of them was wrong. I failed to see anything limiting us as "small providers" , only a definition that "small companies" as defined by xyz census collectors was any company with fewer than xyz employees, which amounted to only __15__ in the united states.
Therefore, ALL providers of broadband are small....or something like that. Forgive me, i'm blabbing before reading everything that has been posted here about this, but that's my first kneejerk reaction. Now I am fearful my comments are being stored in Utah in some massive "Person of Interest" computer system and they're making a note "hey, fuller, that guy has read the rules, he's first on our hit list!!"... Now back to your previously scheduled Saturday night....I have some 2500+ messages to read from these lists since Thursday... :) ----- Original Message ----- From: Coran, Steve To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2015 9:36 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA Members] so nice of them to call us out.... Not arrogance, just a difference of opinion. Advisory opinions may not be so bad if they are truly voluntary and the failure to ask for one cannot be used against an ISP in a complaint proceeding. Stephen E. Coran Lerman Senter, PLLC 2000 K Street, N.W., Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20006-1809 (202) 416-6744 - office (202) 669-3288 -mobile [email protected] On Mar 14, 2015, at 10:31 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> wrote: The arrogance of these people is amazing. Rory -------- Original message -------- From: CBB - Jay Fuller <[email protected]> Date:03/14/2015 7:23 PM (GMT-07:00) To: [email protected], [email protected] Subject: [WISPA Members] so nice of them to call us out.... 238. The Wireless Internet Service Providers Association (WISPA) opposes the adoption of an advisory opinion process “because it assumes an inherent uncertainty in the rules and creates a ‘mother may I’ regime —essentially creating a system where a broadband provider must ask the Commission for permission when making business decisions.”615 According to WISPA, “[t]his system would increase regulatory uncertainty and stifle broadband providers from innovating new technologies or business methods. It also would be expensive for a small provider to implement, requiring legal and professional expertise. 239. We find that WISPA’s concerns are misguided. Because requests for advisory opinions will be entirely voluntary, we disagree with the contention that their use would force broadband providers to seek permission before implementing new policies or technologies and thereby stifle innovation.617 In addition, we agree with other commenters that advisory opinions would provide more, not less, certainty regarding the legality of proposed business practices. _______________________________________________ Members mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/members ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The entirety of this e-mail message and all attachments may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please note that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone or by return e-mail, and delete this communication and all attachments from your computer or PDA. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Members mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/members
