Don't think so. The rules are clear that permitted restrictions have to be 
"reasonable" and if there is a "conflict" the burden of proof is on the 
landlord.
 
Further, restrictions cannot violate the impairment clause in section 2.2 i.e. 
may not unreasonable delay or increase costs, or preclude reception or 
transmission of an acceptable quality signal.
 
This article, written by an attorney, addresses most of the misconceptions that 
have been voiced here
 
http://www.wba-law.com/Unique_Practice_Areas/Homeowners_Associations/
 
John


-----Original Message-----
From: "Adam Moffett" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 9:24pm
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Angry landlord over Roof mount antenna



OTARD says the landlord can't tell you not to put an antenna on the house.  The 
landlord absolutely *can* tell you not to put holes in his property.  The FCC 
website on the topic spells this out pretty clearly.

 I.E.: OTARD protects you if you can manage to install without any 
penetrations.  This is why you'll see apartment complexes with dishes clamped 
on the deck railings and they make flat coax to go in through a window.  

OTARD rules cover it.
It's s town home so you can mount anywhere on their portion of the building 
including the roof.
If he has an issue with the cable and holes he needs to talk to the renter.
You could also let him know that quality internet service makes his property 
more rentable.


 On Monday, March 16, 2015, Darin Steffl <[ [email protected] ]( 
mailto:[email protected] )> wrote:

Hey all,
So I got an angry call from a owner of a townhouse who rents it out to one of 
our new internet customers. We were never made aware the home was a rental in 
any way. Our techs always ask permission on where to mount the dish and bring 
in the wire and they were given approval to mount the dish on the roof and 
drill a hole for the wire. If it was a rental, we would have talked to the 
landlord.
The home owner now wants us to remove the dish, cable, and holes and restore 
everything to original condition. He wants new siding, new shingles, the whole 
works. 

I don't exactly know how I should handle this situation. We won't be pulling 
the mount off the roof because it is sealed if we leave it there. We can't move 
the dish because the signal is only good there. Do we have any sort of 
protection from OTARD or anything that allows us to keep things in place since 
we were given permission from the tenant?
Ideas or ways to handle this smoothly? We are not going to pay for new siding 
or roofing when we were given permission to install. If anything, the tenant 
would be responsible since we did the work on their behalf. -- 


Darin Steffl
Minnesota WiFi
[ www.mnwifi.com ]( http://www.mnwifi.com/ )
507-634-WiFi
[  ]( http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi ) [ Like us on Facebook ]( 
http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi )

Reply via email to