Installing a J-mount (drilling holes in a roof) and cable penetration
(drilling a hole in the side of the house) is DEFINITELY damage to the
property. Any warranty on the roof becomes null and void unless a
certified roofer does the work and certifies the install. Drilling a
hole through the siding and house is also damage.
Travis
On 3/17/2015 11:28 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
I think we differ on what constitutes damage.
Installing a J-mount and a cable penetration, no.
Not sealing the above properly and water or critters intrude upon the
structure, yes.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Travis Johnson" <[email protected]>
*To: *[email protected]
*Sent: *Tuesday, March 17, 2015 12:26:21 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Angry landlord over Roof mount antenna
Tenants do not have the right to damage my property, regardless of
their rights and due process.
Travis
On 3/17/2015 11:19 AM, John Woodfield wrote:
Many landlords with that attitude end up criminally charged. There
is such a thing as tenant rights and due process.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 17, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Josh Luthman
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
It sounds right to me. He owns the land and property. Owner
is king of his castle.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mar 17, 2015 1:13 PM, "John Woodfield"
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I'm calling BS on this.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 17, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Travis Johnson
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> You still have to work it out with the actual owner,
regardless of what the tenant told you or even signed.
>
> Travis
>
>> On 3/17/2015 10:16 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
>>> On 3/17/15 9:11, Travis Johnson wrote:
>>> I would talk to the tenant and try and resolve things,
but the ISP is
>>> who did the actual damage to the property, without
permission. Yes, they
>>> "assumed" they had permission, but without a signed
contract from the
>>> legal owner of the property, the ISP does not have
permission to cause
>>> damage to the property.
>>
>>
>> What do you do if your tenants misrepresent themselves
as the owner with authority?
>>
>> ~Seth
>
