Much better nose immunity on the UBNT. It's real, and it works. Both have pros and cons.
On March 21, 2015 9:05:43 AM AKDT, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]> wrote: >Gimme a Mimosa A5 and I will deploy. A UBNT only .ac without GPS ? No >reason to move to. > > >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >Von: Af [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Rory Conaway >Gesendet: Samstag, 21. März 2015 17:58 >An: [email protected] >Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Does the AC product line require AirMac? > >It depends on how much capacity you need to deliver. I'm planning on >25-50 over the next 12-18 months and more after that. > >Rory > >-----Original Message----- >From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stefan Englhardt >Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 9:36 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Does the AC product line require AirMac? > >We use traditionaly MT and did not find a good reason to change. Our >(early) UBNT Tests convinced us to not change. >Started our tests with horrible Firmware-Versions and therefor dropped >this crap. Sounds they got better in the meantime But I am not conviced >our network will be better changing to UBNT now. >Using ePMP in parts now but they do not proceed to .ac for now. As >we're a PMP320 user we are not sure ePMP will be upgraded to .ac >anytime soon. > >So we upgrade our MTs for the moment, upgrade PTP to Mimosa B5 or SAF >and wait for things to come. > >I guess Mimosa will be our next step. But who knows when/what they >deliver. MT is early with .ac equipment. Maybe they Improve further >until others deliver. Depends on Atheros. > >>I'm not going to Mikrotik. Too close schedule wise for better options >although I might be taking over a small WISP that's all MikroTik. >> >>Rory -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
