Oh crap...I misread the post. "using a UBNT omni" on ePMP. Disregard.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: > At 3 miles using UBNT I'd use a 400mm dish like the Nanobeam 400 in order > to obtain full modulation. If you are using a different form factor radio > (since there is no DFS on Nanobeams), then I'd use a dish like the WB or KP > dish. I'd use that at 3 miles to a high gain sector, so I'd definitely go > with a dish to an omni. > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Vince West <[email protected]> wrote: > >> We have a few sites set up exactly like described. The few integrated >> units we do have on one AP work well with a bare SM at 1mi. Anything out >> further than that we use a Force 100 or Force 110 dish. >> >> Vince West >> Tower Hand >> Technical Support >> Shelby Broadband >> 148 Citizens Blvd >> Simpsonville, KY 40067 >> Phone: 1-888-364-4232 >> >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Andy Trimmell <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> I'm not getting good results on a sector at anything over a mile with an >>> integrated SM. You're going to have to go with a dish if you want good >>> results at 2.9 miles. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *John Woodfield >>> *Sent:* Sunday, March 22, 2015 9:49 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] ePMP Omni >>> >>> >>> >>> Using a UBNT 13dbi 5ghz Omni running 23dbm TX at 5800. Any chance I'm >>> going to get 2.9 miles out of just an integrated SM? Seems like it should >>> work on paper, wasn't sure if anyone had pushed the limit on these to see >>> if they will actually work that that distance with an omni. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> John Woodfield, President >>> >>> Delmarva WiFi Inc. >>> >>> 410-870-WiFi >>> >> >> >
