Ahhh that's right, I forgot. Then the 640 is like 29dBi I believe.
Honestly, AC requires higher SNR for better modulations and increased airtime efficiency, it's the nature of the beast. Our most common CPEs are nanobridges followed very closely by 30dBi rocket dishes and rockets, so we are pretty excited by the cost of the 500 and 640 models. We will be adding new repeaters closer to the customers, but these products will be the stop-gap until that happens. On March 31, 2015 8:24:52 AM AKDT, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: >400s are 25dbi (in the non-AC line), the 500s are, I think 27dbi. > > >On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Josh Reynolds <j...@spitwspots.com> >wrote: > >> Aren't the 500s 25dBi nanobeam replacements? >> >> On March 31, 2015 7:18:45 AM AKDT, Brett A Mansfield < >> br...@silverlakeinternet.com> wrote: >>> >>> I'm hoping someone on this list or one of our friends at ubiquiti >can answer a question for me on the UBNT AC line of products either on >list or off? >>> >>> Are there any 300s or 400s coming for the AC lineup? If so, what >stage are they in? Just waiting on FCC? Testing? Etc? >>> >>> I already own a lot of the NBE-M5AC-19s and a few sectors with >rocket M5s that I'm deploying next week, but may have to rethink my >strategy of these other radios don't come out soon. I cannot justify >the price for the 500s and they are just too massive. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Brett A Mansfield >>> >>> >> -- >> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >> -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
