When I get back to the so tomorrow I'll have to look at the models we used. We did have issues with the first two ports but nothing like you are describing. On Apr 8, 2015 12:19 PM, "Jason McKemie" <[email protected]> wrote:
> This was just one of their industrial switches. > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Craig House <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Is this issue with their media converter, switches or both? I just >> purchased some of the POE+ media converters and have not installed them but >> this sounds a bit disappointing considering I am using Tik's and was hoping >> this would clean up the tower boxes some. >> >> Craig >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> >> *To: *[email protected] >> *Sent: *Wednesday, April 8, 2015 8:36:39 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Planet Switch Packet Loss >> >> Have you sent a supout to Mikrotik support? >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Jason McKemie" <[email protected]> >> *To: *[email protected] >> *Sent: *Tuesday, April 7, 2015 12:42:32 PM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Planet Switch Packet Loss >> >> I did some more testing with this. With the Planet linked to a RB2011 >> via SFP I get even worse packet loss than with the CCR. With the RB2011 >> linked to the CCR via SFP I get no packet loss. With the Planet linked to >> a Cisco router via SFP I also get no packet loss. So it looks like I'm not >> going to be able to use the Planet with Mikrotik, which is a problem >> because Mikrotik is my preferred router for most things. I haven't tried >> loading 6.28RC onto the CCR since I'm a bit wary of experimenting with >> pre-releases on a production router. >> >> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 12:21 PM, cjwstudios <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It could be a combination of the Ccr and planet. I just pray I don't >>> have to reboot the Ccr because I know it will be a long night. >>> On Apr 5, 2015 7:45 PM, "Jason McKemie" < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> So, in summary, it is probably the CCR or a combination of the CCR and >>>> the planet? Am I going to have to go with x86 to get something powerful >>>> with multiple SFPs that is stable? >>>> >>>> On Sunday, April 5, 2015, cjwstudios <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I have the exact same setup and problem except with planet sfps on the >>>>> planet side and tik sfps on the Ccr side. Planet told me it was my fiber >>>>> run so I bought a new $500 certified run which did not fix the problem. >>>>> Rebooting the Ccr 15-20 times usually does. >>>>> On Mar 30, 2015 9:26 PM, "Jason McKemie" < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I'm trying to link up a Planet industrial ethernet switch >>>>>> (IGS-10020MT) with a CCR via SFP ports and bidi optics. I'm getting >>>>>> packet >>>>>> loss (~5%) and the receive errors are incrementing steadily on the >>>>>> switch. >>>>>> Any ideas what I can check here? Do these not work well with generic >>>>>> bidi >>>>>> optics? >>>>>> >>>>>> -Jason >>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >> >
