I think your issue will be the sledgehammer like permissions in the groups. They are pretty wide ranging. You can prohibit winbox, but for things like filter rules and just about anything they would require write privileges. Write is write without the ability to prevent someone from writing all kinds of things you would rather they not.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:35 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < [email protected]> wrote: > Can I use skins to give customers access in a limited capacity, create a > user account called customer or whatever and a customer group that has > limited access like no winbox, etc. Let them manage their wireless, > internal subnets, port forwards, whatever? What I saw glancing at the > metarouter thing seems like its a bigger deal than I wanted to get into, > but if I could create a generic skin for the customer login to load in each > one, that would be slick > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Paul Stewart <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> How would you rate the boxes handling traffic and uptime in general? >> Just curious… >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Paul >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Paul McCall >> *Sent:* Monday, March 30, 2015 3:32 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Pros/Cons and recomendations >> >> >> >> Steve…. Do you trust me? Mikrotik all the way, just DO IT! … >> routerboard.com has all the models. >> >> >> >> slicker than owl-snot on linoleum floor J One of the best things we >> ever did for our network >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >> Behalf Of *That One Guy >> *Sent:* Monday, March 30, 2015 3:27 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Mikrotik Pros/Cons and recomendations >> >> >> >> After poking around at many different brands, it seems Mikrotik is the >> right fit for our network and budget. >> >> >> >> I dont fully understand the licensing tiers >> >> >> >> Is there a sizing chart on these? >> >> >> >> Is the interface similar between the router models and the switch models? >> Are the mikrotik switches comparable to the HP procurve in reliability? >> >> >> >> It would be the bees knees to see out network more universal as far as >> management interfaces go, we have three purposes for routers: >> >> >> >> our upstream routers, which we have 2, will ultimately be running OSPF >> internally and BGP externally (current thought) 200mbps-1gbps projected >> need through the next couple of years. >> >> >> >> Our network/POP routers ranging from 1 customer at a POP to 150 >> >> >> >> A residential solution comparable to the UBNT AirRouters (1-25mbps rate >> plans) wifi capable. >> >> >> >> If the switches have similar interfaces, we would look toward replacing a >> combination of UBNT toughswitch POE, and a variety of HP procurves from >> 1810G to 2510G and their other POE models. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I note alot of discussion regarding MT ethernet negotiation flakiness, >> how much of an impact does this present? Right now we have imagestream and >> fortigate on the network, and have zero issues with that. >> >> >> >> >> >> The decision to go toward mikrotik is primarily based on cost and >> community support availability within the industry. (this consideration has >> alot to do with a single point of administrative failure in only having one >> person, me, training to design, maintain, support, and grow the network, in >> the event i became absent from the picture) The winbox interface and >> feature availability within was also a primary consideration for support >> staff. >> >> >> >> I would like to her from people entrenched in MT who love/hate it, >> anybody who turned their back on it, and anybody who moved toward it. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
