Horseshit, read the article. Did you miss the portion where Jim said "it's the exact same chip that's in the RM5"?
I would have liked to have seen the RM5 in this test as a baseline, but ignoring the results simply because it's N tech in the EPMP is silly. Not only does the throughput drop, but the LEVEL it degrades at is only "bested" by the B5C in a few of the tests. N or not, that's a very poor result. I would love to see other tests posted on this from other people, its always nice to have multiple sources to remove any potential level of bias. Jim did an excellent job on this and should be commended. On April 18, 2015 2:26:50 PM AKDT, Seth Mattinen <[email protected]> wrote: >On 4/18/15 2:49 PM, Peter Kranz wrote: >> Very interesting shootout comparing AF5X, AC-Lite, AC PTP, EPMP-1000, >> B5c and RB922 >> >> >https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-Stories/Radio-Shootout-Pt-2-let-s-try-a-whole-bunch-of-them/cns-p/1232309 >> > > >Dude didn't seem to catch that the ePMP is an N radio and dismisses it >as worst of the worst. Looks to me like it would probably hold up >comparably to its AC counterparts if you take that into consideration. > >~Seth -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
