Rocket M5 craps out around 60Mbps.  You can increase the channel size to 30
or 40 and maybe occasionally see 80Mbps on a Rocket M5.  On the Rocket we
would see latency go through the roof under full load.  It would hit near
300-400ms at times.  On the AC PTP we immediately saw 140Mbps on a fairly
dirty 30MHz channel (21CINR), and latency hovered around 6ms even under
full load.  I haven't played with the AC enough to really push it to the
limit and see what it can do, but it smokes the M series stuff like night
and day.

On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Jon Langeler <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Can you share some numbers compared to Rocket M5?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On May 1, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I have been running beta2 on PTP UBNT AC for months now without issue, and
> am extremely happy with the product (except the whole DFS
> issue...surprise!).  If beta2 has issues I haven't seen them.  Is it worth
> upgrading to beta5?  I'm of the mindset 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it'.
> I am especially leery of upgrading firmware that is working fine.  I'll
> watch the forums for awhile and then upgrade, like usual.  Meanwhile, this
> AC PTP is rocking!
>
> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Matt Hardy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> There were some issues with AC PTP fixed with the latest beta (released
>> this week), but to my knowledge there are no known issues with PtMP.
>> Everyone that is using AC PtMP seems to be happy...
>>
>> -Matt
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 8:17 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Peter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> That’s the opposite to what I see.
>>>
>>> The old Rocket’s for me were better with interference.
>>>
>>> That being said, I’ve only tried P2P with AC kit
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Peter Kranz
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, 30 April 2015 3:34 PM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Rocket to ePMP migration
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I’m seeing good results with RM5AC in regards to interference and weak
>>> signals.. Probably 4x better than RM5 radios.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Peter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T)
>>>
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 29, 2015 8:37 PM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Rocket to ePMP migration
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Depending on what vendor is doing the testing the results are different.
>>>
>>> Really hard to decide if I’m upgrading or side grading.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Not so keen on the AC stuff, seems not to like interference and need
>>> super strong signal.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Rhys
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Josh Reynolds [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>]
>>>
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, 30 April 2015 1:34 PM
>>> *To:* [email protected]; Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T)
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Rocket to ePMP migration
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Its the same chip :P
>>>
>>> That aside, have not, so I'll back out of this now.
>>>
>>> On April 29, 2015 7:31:54 PM AKDT, "Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T)" <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Have many of you Migrated from an Airmax network to ePMP?
>>>
>>> I can’t decide if I should take the plunge.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have about 2000 customers,  any Rocket with about 50+ customers is
>>> staring to bend.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Any thought please?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> :-)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to