The Rocket M5’s seem to vary the power output about 21dBm based on the 
modulation rate which makes it difficult to determine what’s happening.   And 
the NanoBridge’s do that above 18dBm since they are lower power and based on 
bench tests that I’ve seen, power output numbers might be optimistic.  I got 
suspicious when I compared a Powerbridge-25 to a Rocket M5 with the 30dBi 
antenna and the Powerbridge was slightly better on a 10 mile shot.   Since my 
Jirrous antennas are on AF5x radios, I’m more comfortable with my guesses but 
they are just that.

Rory

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 8:09 AM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: Wi-Fi Jirous

I replaced a NanoBridge M5 with a RocketM5 and a Jirous 24 dbi dish last week, 
I actually got a slight improvement (~2db) over what the Nanobridge had been 
doing (which could just be because it's mounted differently). But anyway, I 
just tested it on various channels, and I'm not seeing any significant 
difference on 5.2ghz. on 5225, It was 1-2 db weaker than what I saw on 5735, 
but 5840 was slightly weaker than 5225, so I'm not sure how much that means... 
none of the channels are particularly clean (this link normally lives in the 
DFS band).

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Rory Conaway 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I put up the existing ones and I’m running them in 5.2 and 5.8GHz.  In 5.2GHz, 
my gut-o-meter says they are probably down about 5 dBi.

Rory

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf 
Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 7:34 AM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: [AFMUG] Fwd: Wi-Fi Jirous

I asked Jirous about the lower 5 GHz band. This is what they said. I think once 
translated into English it says they'll have new versions of their antennas 
with similar performance to what they have now that supports lower 5 GHz in a 
few months.


-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL>

Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com

[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
________________________________
From: "Wi-Fi Jirous" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 9:24:17 AM
Subject: Wi-Fi Jirous


Hi Mike,

thank you for your mail.
We plan prepare new revision of our parabolic antennas - what will cower the 
wide range of 5 GHz frq. in similar prerformance as the declared range now -  
inmediately, after we will have built our new measurement equipment, what is 
now in process of synchronisation of software electronic and mechanical parts.
This solution help us be more flexible by developing of antennas in future.

The launch of measurements on this new equipment is estimated in few months.
Thank you, that youre interested in our products and have a nice day, Csaba


Reply via email to