for an interim move (I have to prove mikrotik to the boss) there could be as many as 90 at one point. Imagestream occasionally would get fussy if I had multiple router interfaces on the same physical network segment, does mikrotik get fussy about this?
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > Likely no limit. How many are you trying to put on? > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Wednesday, May 13, 2015 11:18:08 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik stable OS version > > > Do these things have a limit to the number of secondary IPs you can put on > an interface? I cant find it documented > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> No problems with newer 6.x Version. We’ve 6.15 and 6.25 running on them. >> >> Seems 6.x tree matures. But it is MT. You never know ;-)). >> >> >> >> >> >> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *That One Guy >> /sarcasm >> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 13. Mai 2015 16:51 >> *An:* [email protected] >> *Betreff:* [AFMUG] Mikrotik stable OS version >> >> >> >> just got in an rb1100ahx2 What is the current most stable software >> version recomended on these? >> >> >> >> -- >> >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
