I don't know what you have seen but the percentage of components failing at
the lie side of the range is pretty small. Having said that, we might have
temps down to +10 f for three days on the extreme side so what do I know.
On May 18, 2015 9:09 PM, "Forrest Christian (List Account)" <
[email protected]> wrote:

> What is the lowest temperature that each of you would normally expect to
> see in your enclosures?
>
> The reason I'm asking is that I'm in the process of developing up a few
> new products.
>
> To date, all of the packetflux products are designed with components rated
> -40 to +85C (I.E way cold to way hot).    I'd like to retain this rating,
> but I'm running into a minor snag:
>
> For storage, I'm planning on integrating a SD card (probably microSD) in a
> socket.   I only need a GB or so, and SD card memory is inexpensive at that
> range.
>
> Unfortunately, all the reasonably priced SD cards are only rated down to
> about -25C or -13F. which are about ~$3 in qty.   "Industrial temperature
> range" ones which are good down to -40C/F are available but they add at
> least $30 to the cost for non-name brand, and even more for known brands.
> When you're talking about a $100 end-user price, a $30 1GB SD card seems
> excessive - and probably isn't even possible if I want to meet the $100
> price with some margin.
>
> So, I'm currently playing the 'what options do I have' game.   I hate to
> ship a product only rated down to -25C/-13F, but I know for at least a
> large chunk of my customer base they never see below this temperature,
> especially when you add a watt of power dissipation in the case with the
> device.  Which leads me back to my original question:  What's the lowest
> temperature most people would expect to see inside their enclosures.
>
> --
> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
> [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>  <http://facebook.com/packetflux>
>   <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>
>
>

Reply via email to