I don't see much of a market for it at that price. There would probably be a few cases where it'd be worth it, but if you really need a radome that badly, there are always other antenna options.
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Colin Stanners <[email protected]> wrote: > I think so, for the longer/higher links where windload is more of a > factor, you'd be using bigger antennas than the Force 110 anyways. Also > based on the fcc id for the ePMP with integrated dipole that we saw, > Cambium is likely coming out with a non-coax version of the Force dishes > soon that may need a different radome. > On May 19, 2015 2:37 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That will probably not get released. >> >> I did a radome for the Force 110 dish. >> Not sure there is a market for it at a street price of $59. >> >> The sheet of plastic is expensive, the UV coating adds cost and labor... >> It is thermoformed which is a more expensive way of doing low runs. >> >> I am not going to make the investment in tooling to do an injection >> molded one unless someone wants to order 2500 pcs. >> >> So, is this DOA? >> >
