it shows 3 in the areas, but only 2 neighbors On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote:
> I know I've put at least three /30s on the same interface and I don't > remember running into problems. When you're running OSPF on a /30 one > router will always be the designated router and the other will be the > backup - I don't think it normally matters which router has which role, but > you can make it prefer one of the other by setting the interface priority. > > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:03 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> So I have this here mikrotik Ive been implementing ospf on >> Right now because this is transition, all MT ports hit the same switch >> Eth6 is on a /30 that is going to a powercode BMU thats distributing the >> default route, it works fine >> Eth2 is on a /30 that is going to a fortigate, it works fine >> >> the routes propagate as they should >> >> I initially tried to add another /30 to Eth2 for a second fortigate, but >> it wouldnt let me add the netwok >> so I put that /30 on eth3 it comes up in a state designated router >> >> I moved it to eth4, same thing designated router the other two that are >> working have said backup all along >> >> is there something about adding a third ospf interface to mikrotik i need >> to know here? >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
