That’s right. I’d better request an advisory ruling. From: George Skorup Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 12:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mt ospf question
Easily negated with a routing filter on the OSPF-out chain. We can all argue this all day long. Nobody is wrong. Run your network how you want.. until the FCC starts dictating routing config too. :| On 5/21/2015 12:39 PM, Dennis Burgess wrote: You have tech ports on your routers, say, 10.199.199.1/24 on each site. That is a private block that you NAT at each site just for your on-site tech to use if needed.. now, the issue, all of your routers are advertising and basically arguing who has 10.199.199.0/24 !
