Haha, funny you mention that! Their recently former COO is now one of my 
customers. He was the Chief Ops Officer specifically for Vivint Wireless.

Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield

> On May 21, 2015, at 1:26 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 5 GHz with FSK doesn’t even penetrate walls and vegetation.  Be interesting 
> to see what happens to their chief technology officer when the truth begins 
> to filter up to the C level.  
>  
> From: Rory Conaway
> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 1:23 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] vivint
>  
> Vivint is also relaying through their internal/half-duplex routers to avoid 
> putting antennas on the roof.  That was their original idea.  They are 
> finding out that most people need outdoor installations.  For some reason, 
> 5GHz with 256QAM doesn’t penetrated outside walls and vegetation.  That’s a 
> handy piece of information to have when you are planning to spend tens of 
> millions of dollars.
>  
> Rory
>  
> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brett A  Mansfield
> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 12:20 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] vivint
>  
> I have several customers on 3.65 links, so vivint doesn't interfere with 
> their signal. But I had one of these customers call me a week ago and tell me 
> they are having massive buffer issues. When I went to check it out I saw that 
> Vivint had put up a hub home right next door. My customer said it went up two 
> days before and that is when they started having their issue. So Vivint is 
> causing so much interference in the 5GHz area that people's home routers 
> aren't even working. I gave her a 2.4GHz router and she is happy now.
>  
> So, even if you get the 50Mb to your Vivint device, you won't be able to use 
> it over your wireless network in 5GHz.
> 
> Thank you,
> Brett A Mansfield
> 
> On May 21, 2015, at 1:08 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Vivint is kind of the worst of every idea.  They spend a boatload on licensed 
> spectrum, an excessive amount on backhaul radios and co-location costs, all 
> of which requires a high-density of users.  Then they deploy a non-TDMA mesh 
> protocol so that when the density starts to increase, they cause their own 
> interference.  The 5GHz technology they are deploying can’t support the 
> density they need to make this profitable.  Then when connections don’t work, 
> they deploy hacked together flat-panels to make the connection which then 
> causes problems for other users because the flat-panel is too directional.  
> I’m really not sure who is designing this but it reminds me of the EarthLink 
> mesh deployments.  What I can’t figure out is how that design gets past a 
> technical and financial review.  This is a multi-billion dollar, 
> international company.  Somebody should have figured out that there weren’t 
> going to get 50Mbps through a mesh system consistently with vegetation and 
> that the costs weren’t going to be in line with the revenue/density. 
>  
> Rory
>  
>  
>  
> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe Falaschi
> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 11:51 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] vivint
>  
> I heard they were using this in 28GHz for BH to their micro sites:
>  
> http://cbnl.com/vectastar-gigabit-highlights
>  
>  
> Joe Falaschi
> e-vergent
>  
>  
>  
> On May 21, 2015, at 1:29 PM, Sterling Jacobson wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> I think they are sometimes 5Ghz and sometimes something else on the houses.
> The backhauls appear to be the unlicensed SAF 20+GHZ stuff to nearby drops.
>  
> Most of those in Saratoga Springs are connected to CentraCom Fiber at the 
> schools etc.
>  
> And they are doing 50Mbps for $50 or $60 depending on who you talk to.
>  
> So maybe they outperform DirectCom now, but when you guys get more fiber and 
> for a better price they will switch.
>  
> We took over quite a few in some neighborhoods already.
>  
> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 12:20 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [AFMUG] vivint
>  
> Anyone know if the APs are 5.8 GHz?  I saw one going in today.  Fed with a 
> backhaul with a 2 foot dish.  Couldn’t get close enough to see if it was 
> licensed or not.  The AP antennas look like little whips.  At roof top.  In a 
> very heavy tree’d neighborhood.  With trees taller than the houses.  With a 
> bunch of other WISPs in the area...  And I just rolled fiber down that street.
>  
> Wonder who will win in the end?
>  

Reply via email to