Or how bout a log file :) Have any of you ever used pfsense? It does the majority of this stuff out of the box, the rest would just require minor tweaks.
On May 28, 2015 11:40:05 AM AKDT, Shayne Lebrun <[email protected]> wrote: >That’s easy enough; a big pool of dynamic addresses and a small pool of >static. > > > >The issue, though, is when people are throwing up devices all willy >nilly, and the courts ask you ‘who had IP x.x.x.x on jan 5, 2015?’ > > > >Translation bridging is one answer. Authenticated DHCP is another. > > > >From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sterling Jacobson >Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 2:51 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [AFMUG] dhcpatriot > > > >Probably. > > > >But then what about those customers that want a “permanently” assigned >IP? > > > >Maybe you and I should hire out someone to engineer a solution we can >both use. > > > >If the change in MAC is tracked, it can (eventually) be re-assigned to >the public IP that belongs to them in that case. > > > > > > > >From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown >Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 12:47 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [AFMUG] dhcpatriot > > > >I presume a log could be created each time an IP is handed out tying it >to a MAC. > > > >From: Cassidy B. Larson <mailto:[email protected]> > >Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 12:39 PM > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: [AFMUG] dhcpatriot > > > >As long as you can track a particular user to an IP for things such as >subpoenas, copyright infringement emails, I think you’ll be fine. > > > >On May 28, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >I am trying to convince myself that this is not a good idea. I can’t >seem to find a compelling reason to authenticate or limit leases. > > > >From: Simon Westlake <mailto:[email protected]> > >Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 12:33 PM > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: [AFMUG] dhcpatriot > > > >Or you could even just run wide open DHCP at that point if you don't >care about authentication or limiting leases. > >On May 28, 2015 1:16 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote: > >Yeah, trying to eliminate the user having to authenticate. We know the >MAC of the fiber terminal. We have control over the DLS lines. We >have to enable either the fiber or the phone for them to get service, >in my mind that is plenty of authentication. > > > >Like to have a user plug and play with no extra steps. Like to not >have any more databases. I really don’t care who the user is etc. If >they can get service they are supposed to get service. > > > >From: Simon Westlake <mailto:[email protected]> > >Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 12:08 PM > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: [AFMUG] dhcpatriot > > > >You could probably do a really short DHCP lease on the initial walled >garden IP, I don't know how short DHCP Patriot supports, but I would >imagine the shortest would probably still be 60 seconds. > >On 5/28/2015 12:58 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: > >Be nice to make it so that a DSL modem/router could power up and just >start working without any power cycling. > > > >From: Charles Boening <mailto:[email protected]> > >Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 11:28 AM > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: [AFMUG] dhcpatriot > > > >We have had a DHCPatriot system for about 5 years. We love it. It’s >essentially a captive portal. When a user first connects, they get a >private IP and policy routing forces them to the portal. When the user >authenticates, the system uses a local user database or RADIUS to >authenticate the them and if successful, ties the MAC address to a >username. Now that the user is known, they reboot their device (or >release/renew or wait a few minutes) and the system assigns an IP >address from the authenticated address pool. > > > >Infoblox looks like it has a few more features (some DNS and IPAM >stuff). > > > >If you’re in the market for something like the DHCPatriot system, I >recommend getting a demo. > > > >__________________________________ > > > >Charles Boening > >Network Manager > >800-858-2399 | Office > >[email protected] > > > ><http://www.cot.net/> www.cot.net | Find us on ><https://www.facebook.com/pages/Cal-Ore/205066716227707> Facebook > >__________________________________ > >Cal-Ore | Real. Local. Trusted. Professional. > > > >From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Simon Westlake >Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 6:31 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [AFMUG] dhcpatriot > > > >I thought it was pretty interesting. Infoblox has a nice DHCP server >too. > >On May 27, 2015 4:34 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote: > >Anyone know anything about this product? > >http://www.network1.net/products/dhcpatriot/ > > > > -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
