Replacing UBNT with what? 450? Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 3, 2015, at 8:08 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don't buy the LTE NLOS pitch. It's too goddamn expensive to get good > performance (3 or 4 4x4 sectors instead of a dual omni or split 2x2 sectors) > to put 30, 40 or even 50 customers on a site which is all we have in rural > areas. We'll never make any money buying Telrad. I can put up 4 sectors of > 450 for ONE Telrad. > > I get it though. Standardized stuff is nice. But if you don't have the > customers for it to make sense financially, all that goes out the window. > > We never deployed any 320. And we're ripping out UBNT 3.65 as fast as > possible. > >> On 6/3/2015 4:08 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: >> Im stuck with it. We bought an overstock load of APs and SMs. We have a >> dream of Telrad working out to save the day with their firmware load. Some >> creative Telrad AP deployments gradually replacing the 320 APs, utilizing >> the 320 CPEs until we migrate the site to LTE with telrad CPEs, giving us >> 320 CPEs to redeploy. >> >> The dream is somebody will write some magic code to sit on an intermediary >> server to communicate with the FCC database thing so we can redeploy the 320 >> APs to small sites. >> >> We had two test sites for the 450. One site landlord hasnt allowed us up >> there to swap equipment, we have to deal with that on the lease side and our >> other 450 test site has only 3 users on it with good links so we havent been >> able to test the 1x magic out. >> >> I would have preferred to more aggressively pursue the 450 and be able to >> sell higher throughput higher dollar connections, to offset the potential >> nlos customers we would lose. something about being able to sync with >> competitors down the road seemed like a good idea to me, especially with an >> AP with 3x the throughput and the whole not using gear thats end of life, >> but i am but a lowly sysadmin with no access to the purse strings. >> >>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I am just curious how many of you have decided to keep using the 320 series >>> because it goes through trees a lot better than the 450 series 3.65 product? >>> >>> >>> >>> Are you expanding with it as far as towers go? Or, are you just adding SMs >>> to what you already have? >>> >>> >>> >>> Paul >>> >>> >>> >>> Paul McCall, Pres. >>> >>> PDMNet / Florida Broadband >>> >>> 658 Old Dixie Highway >>> >>> Vero Beach, FL 32962 >>> >>> 772-564-6800 office >>> >>> 772-473-0352 cell >>> >>> www.pdmnet.com >>> >>> [email protected] >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as >> part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
