+1000 on everything in your second paragraph.

From: Adam Moffett 
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 6:30 AM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Static & Nearby Lightning Issues

Should have specified: Superior Essex BBDGe with the copper clad steel armor.  
That spec sheet includes unarmored cables also.  You can get similar products 
from Mohawk and Belden.

I've also never done it that way.  For a lot of reasons I like rigid metallic 
conduit up the tower.  You can't get a better electrical or mechanical shield 
than that.  No squirrel on this earth can chew through it.  Some joker can't 
come along and bundle his cable in with yours.  Nobody can accidentally nip it 
with pliers or stomp it with their boot.  



On 6/4/2015 7:21 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:

  You wouldn't use the ground kit with a foil shield.  You'd get an outside 
plant cable with armor on it.
  Example: https://objects.eanixter.com/PD327279.PDF



  On 6/4/2015 12:31 AM, Edward Brooks wrote:

    How does it go on without nicking that thin foil? Is there a tool for the 
Cat5? I looked at the Commscope installation guide and it said smooth copper 
coax (Heliax) or braided.

    -Ed

    Sent from my slightly heavy military grade Smartphone

    Jaime Solorza mailto:[email protected] wrote:


    We  use those on super flex but not on heliax...use the other old school 
version


    Jaime Solorza

    So, something like this then?   
https://www.tessco.com/products/displayProductInfo.do?sku=445755




    On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Tyson Burris @ Internet Comm. Inc 
<[email protected]> wrote:

      Simple:  buy cat 5 grounding kits for
      Shielded cable.  Use them at top, middle and bottom. No more no less.  
Doesn't involve cutting cable just connect into shield and water proof like 
hell. 

      Sent from my iPhone

      On Jun 3, 2015, at 6:35 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:


        I would NOT put Cat5 surge protectors every 50-75 feet, you will likely 
get Ethernet errors and/or negotiation problems.  At most there should be one 
at each end.

        You are probably thinking of coax, and even so I suspect those are 
shield grounds, not actual surge protectors.

        I do agree with not making your antennas the highest thing on the tower 
if you can help it.

        If you must use an omni antenna located at the top, I have had some 
success with a COAX surge protector between the radio and the antenna.  
Polyphaser makes some DC blocking types that work OK and aren’t too expensive.  
If lightning hits, the omni is still probably toast, but it might save the 
radio.

        From: Edward Brooks 
        Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 5:24 PM
        To: [email protected] 
        Subject: [AFMUG] Static & Nearby Lightning Issues

        Here goes...
             We have a new 118' Super Titan Max tower that has been grounded 
per manufacturers recommendations.  Each leg is physically bonded (not 
exothermically) to a 10' ground rod, all ground rods are then connected to each 
other in a ring.  The equipment cabinet is bonded to an 8' ground rod and tied 
into the meter base grounding as well.  The two ground rings are then bonded to 
each other in 2 separate places.
             With that said our issue has not been with the grounding, but with 
the dissipation of static at the height of the antennas.  We currently have had 
the worst problems with the 3 Cyclone 2.4 antennas which are currently located 
on masts at the top of the tower.  We have also had issues with a couple of the 
5.7 Cyclones located below the top of the tower, but not as frequently.  The 
center-line of the 2.4 APs is 120' AGL, the height of the tower is 118' AGL.  
We currently have WB-GigE-APC surge arrestors located in the cabinet which is 
located 10 ft from the base of the tower.
             After doing some research through various Cambium manuals and the 
Motorola R56 manual, I have some idea what our issue is, but would like to 
bounce those ideas off the community.  My thought is that we neglected to put 
surge arrestors at 50' to 75' intervals (as recommended by the Motorola R56 
manual) and 1 at the top for use in thunderstorm areas.  Also we may need to 
lower the APs to a minimum of 2ft below the top of the tower (per the Cambium 
manuals for various antenna types).

             Any suggestions or comments would be appreciated.  What have you 
done to mitigate this problem?  Etc...

        Thanks,
        -Ed
        -- 
        Edward Brooks
        Outside Plant Manager
        The Montana Internet Corporation
        406-443-3347 X506




------------------------------------------------------------------------
                This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus 
software. 
              www.avast.com 
             






Reply via email to